Home visitation practice: Models, documentation, and evaluation

Public Health Nursing

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 21-29

  Drummond, Jane E ^a   Weir, Angela E ^b   Kysela, Gerard M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Health promotion; Home visitation; Measurement; Practices

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANADA; CHILD; CHILD HEALTH CARE; COMMUNITY HEALTH NURSING; DOCUMENTATION; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREGNANCY; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; RESIDENTIAL CARE;

ADULT; ALBERTA; CATCHMENT AREA (HEALTH); CHILD; CHILD HEALTH SERVICES; DOCUMENTATION; FEMALE; HOUSE CALLS; HUMANS; MATERNAL HEALTH SERVICES; MODELS, ORGANIZATIONAL; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PREGNANCY; PUBLIC HEALTH NURSING;

EID: 0036358330     PISSN: 07371209     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1446.2002.19004.x     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Bloom, M., Fischer, J., & Orme, J. G. (1995). Evaluating practice: Guidelines for the accountable professional. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
2. Bovolek, S. J. (1998). AAPI manual. Park City, UT: Family Development Resources Inc.
3. Brandt, P. (1989). Network survey. Seattle, WA: NCAST, University of Washington.
4. Breeding, W., Grishman, M. H., & Moreland, M. (1996). Implementation of a computerized social work data base/assessments. Social Work in Health Care, 23(1), 81-98.
5. Capital Health Authority. (1997). How healthy are we? Health status in the Capital Health Region: A technical report. Edmonton, Alberta, Canada: Author.
6. Capital Health Authority. (2000). [On-line]. Available: http:// www.cha.ab.ca/site/info/about/htm.
7. Drummond, J., & Kysela, G. M. (1999). Health for two parent support program: Evaluation report. Edmonton, Alberta, Canada: Alberta Health.
8. Drummond, J., Kysela, G. M., McDonald, L., Alexander, J., & Fleming, D. (1997). Risk and resiliency in two samples of Canadian families. Health and Canadian Society, 4(1), 117-152.
9. Edmonton unemployment statistics. (2000). [On-line]. Available: http://www.statcan.ca/english/Pgdb/People/Labour/labor35.htm.
10. Frankenburg, W. K., Dodds, J., Archer, P., Bresnick, B., Maschka, P., Edelman, N., & Shapiro, H. (1990). Denver II: Training manual. Denver, CO: Denver Developmental Materials Inc.
11. Gottlieb, L. N., & Allen, F. M. (1997). Developing a classification system to examine a model of nursing in primary care. In L. N. Gottlieb & H. Ezer (Eds.), A perspective on health, family, learning, and collaborative nursing: A collection of writings on the Mcgill model of nursing. Montreal: Mcgill University School of Nursing.
12. Henry, S. B., & Mead, C. N. (1997). Nursing classification systems: Necessary but not sufficient for representing "what nurses do" for inclusion in computer-based patient record systems. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 4(3), 222-232.
13. Keller, L. O., Strohschein, S., Lia-Hoagberg, B., & Schaffen, M. (1998). Population-based public health nursing interventions: A model from practice. Public Health Nursing, 15(3), 207-215.
14. Luthar, S. S., Cocchetti, D., & Becker, B. (2000). The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development, 71(3), 543-562.
15. Miller, I. W., Epstein, N. B., Bishop, D. S., & Keitner, G. I. (1985). The McMaster Family Assessment Device: Reliability and validity. Journal of Marital & Family Therapy, 11(4), 345-356.
16. Miller, W., & Rollnick, S. (1991). Motivational interviewing. New York: The Guilford Press.
17. National Forum on Health. (1997). Canada health action: Building on the legacy, II. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Author.
18. Pearson, C. L. (1990). Service inputs and outputs. In T. Y. Ying-Ying & M. Rivest (Eds.), Preserving families: Evaluation resources for practitioners and policymakers (pp. 62-75). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19. Prochaska, J. O., DiClemente, C., & Norcross, J. (1994). Changing for good. New York: W. Morrow.
20. Ramey, C. T., & Ramey, S. L. (1998). Early intervention and early experience. American Psychologist, 53(2), 109-120.
21. Sawin, K. J., & Harrigan, M. (1994). Measures of family functioning for research and practice: Well-established self-report instruments. Scholarly Inquiry for Nursing Practice, 8(1), 11-17.
22. Siegel, L. (1989). A reconceptualization of prediction from infant test scores. In M. Bornstein & N. Krasneger (Eds.), Stability and continuity in mental development: Behavioral and biological perspectives (pp. 89-103). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23. Slonim-Nevo, V. (1997). Evaluating practice: The dual role of clinician and evaluator. Families in Society, 78(3), 228-238.
24. Stewart, M., Reid, G., & Mangham, C. (1997). Fostering children's resilience. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 12(1), 21-31.
25. Sumner, G., & Spietz, A. (1995). NCAST caregiver/parent-child interactive teaching manual. Seattle, WA: NCAST Publications. University of Washington, School of Nursing.
26. Thorman, G. (1982). Helping troubled families: A social work perspective (pp. 41-63). New York: Aldine Publishing.
27. Twohy, K. M., & Reif, L. (1997). What do public health nurses really do during prenatal home appointments? Public Health Nursing, 14(6), 324-331.
28. Vosler, N. (1997). Effective practice: Our common goal. Families in Society, 78(3), 232.
29. Whitehead, M. (1997). Editorial: How useful is the stages of change model? Health Education Journal, 56, 111-112.
30. Wrightson, D. (1999, February). Health for two. Report presented to Women's Health Council, Capital Health Region.
31. Ying-Ying, T. Y., & Rivest, M. (1990). Preserving families: Evaluation resources for practitioners and policymakers. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.