State supreme court decision making in confession cases

Justice System Journal

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 109-133

  Benesh, Sara C ^a   Martinek, Wendy L ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036354329     PISSN: 0098261X     EISSN: 23277556     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0098261X.2002.10767661     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES COURTS (2000). Judicial Business of the United States Courts: 1999 Annual Report of the Director. http://www.uscourts.gov/judbus1999/contents.html
2. ALDRICH, J. H., and F. D. NELSON (1984). Linear Probability, Logit, and Probit Models. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications
3. BAUM, L. (1978). “Lower-Court Response to Supreme Court Decisions: Reconsidering a Negative Picture,” 3 Justice System Journal 208
4. BENESH, S. C. (2002). The U.S. Courts of Appeals and the Law of Confessions: Perspectives on the Hierarchy of Justice. NewYork: LFB Scholarly Publishing
5. BENESH, S. C. (2000). “Modeling the Supreme Court-Circuit Court Relationship Formally.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago
6. BERRY, W. D., E. J. RINGQUIST, R. C. FORDING, and R. L. HANSON (1998). “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 19601993,” 42 American Journal of Political Science 327
7. BRACE, P., and M. G. HALL (1995). “Studying Courts Comparatively: The View from the American States,” 48 Political Research Quarterly 5
8. BRACE, P., M. G. HALL, and L. LANGER (1996). “Judicial Choice and the Politics of Abortion: Institutions, Context, and the Autonomy of Courts.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C
9. BRACE, P., L. LANGER, and M. G. HALL (2000). “Measuring the Preferences of State Supreme Court Judges,” 62 Journal of Politics 387
10. BREHM, J., and S. GATES (1997). Working, Shirking, and Sabotage: Bureaucratic Response to a Democratic Public. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
11. BRISBIN, R. A., and J. C. KILWEIN (1994). “U.S. Supreme Court Review of State High Court Decisions,” 78 Judicature 33
12. BUREAU OF JUSTICE STATISTICS (1998). State Court Organization, 1998. http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/abstract/sco98.htm
13. COUNCIL OF STATE GOVERNMENTS (various years). Book of the States. Lexington, KY: Council of State Governments
14. EMMERT, C. F., and C. A. TRAUT (1994). “The California Supreme Court and the Death Penalty,” 22 American Politics Quarterly 41
15. EPSTEIN, L., and T. G. WALKER (1995). “The Role of the Supreme Court in American Society: Playing the Reconstruction Game,” in L. Epstein (ed.), Contemplating Courts. Washington, DC: CQ Press
16. EPSTEIN, L., J. A. SEGAL, H. J. SPAETH, and T. G. WALKER (1996). The Supreme Court Compendium: Data, Decisions and Developments, 2nd ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press
17. FLEMMING, G. N., D. B. HOLIAN, and S. G. MEZEY (1998). “An Integrated Model of Privacy Decision Making in State Supreme Courts.” 26 American Politics Quarterly 35
18. GILLMAN, H., and C. W. CLAYTON (1999). “Beyond Judicial Attitudes: Institutional Approaches to Supreme Court Decision-making,” in C. W. Clayton and H. Gillman (eds.), Supreme Court Decision-making: New Institutionalist Approaches. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
19. GRANO, J. D. (1996). Confessions, Truth, and the Law. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
20. HALL, M. G. (1992). “Electoral Politics and Strategic Voting in State Supreme Courts,” 54 Journal of Politics 427
21. HALL, M. G., and P. BRACE (1999). “State Supreme Courts and Their Environments: Avenues to General Theories of Judicial Choice,” in C. W. Clayton and H. Gillman (eds.), Supreme Court Decision-making: New Institutionalist Approaches. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
22. HALL, M. G., and P. BRACE (1996). “Justices’ Responses to Case Facts: An Interactive Model,” 24 American Politics Quarterly 237
23. HALL, M. G., and P. BRACE (1994). “The Vicissitudes of Death by Decree: Forces Influencing Capital Punishment Decision-making in State Supreme Courts,” 75 Social Science Quarterly 136
24. HALL, M. G., and P. BRACE (1992). “Toward an Integrated Model of Judicial Voting Behavior,” 20 American Politics Quarterly 147
25. INBAU, F. E., and J. E. REID (1962). Criminal Interrogation and Confessions. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins Company
26. KORT, F. (1963). “Content Analysis of Judicial Opinions and Rules of Law,” in G. A. Schubert (ed.), Judicial Decision-making. Glencoe, IL: Free Press
27. LANGER, L. (1999). “Strategic Behavior and Policy Saliency to the Elected Elite: A Comparative Examination of State Judicial Review Across Four Areas of Law, 1970-1993.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago
28. LANGER, L. (1997). “State Supreme Courts and Countermajoritarian Behavior: Strategic or Sincere?” Paper presented at the Conference on the Scientific Study of Judicial Politics, Emory University, Atlanta
29. MARTINEK, W. L. (2000). “Judicial Impact: The Relationship between the United States Supreme Court and State Courts of Last Resort in Search and Seizure Decision Making.” Ph.D. diss., Michigan State University, East Lansing
30. MITNICK, B. M. (1991). “An Incentive Systems Model of the Regulatory Environment,” in M. J. Dubnik and A. R. Gitelson (eds.), Public Policy and Economic Institutions. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press
31. MITNICK, B. M. (1980). The Political Economy of Regulation: Creating, Designing, and Removing Regulatory Forms. New York: Columbia University Press
32. MITNICK, B. M. (1975). “The Theory of Agency: The Policing ‘Paradox’and Regulatory Behavior,” 24 Public Choice 27
33. MOE, T. M. (1987). “An Assessment of the Positive Theory of ‘Congressional Dominance,’” 12 Legislative Studies Quarterly 475
34. NATIONAL CENTER FOR STATE COURTS (1995). State Court Caseload Statistics, 1994. Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts
35. REDDICK, M. (1997). “The Applicability of the Legal and Attitudinal Models to the Treatment of Precedent in the Courts of Appeals.” Ph.D. diss., Michigan State University, East Lansing
36. ROHDE, D. W., and H. J. SPAETH (1976). Supreme Court Decision Making. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman
37. ROSENBERG, G. N. (1991). The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? Chicago: University of Chicago Press
38. ROSS, S. A. (1973). “The Economic Theory of Agency: The Principal’s Problem,” 62 American Economic Review 134
39. RUTLEDGE, D. (1994). Criminal Interrogation: Law and Tactics. Placerville, CA: Copperhouse Publishing Company
40. SCHAFER, W. J. III (1968). Confessions and Statements. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas, Publisher
41. SEGAL, J. A. (1997). “Separation-of-Powers Games in the Positive Theory of Congress and Courts,” 91 American Political Science Review 28
42. SEGAL, J. A., and A. D. COVER (1989). “Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices,” 83 American Political Science Review 557
43. SEGAL, J. A., L. EPSTEIN, C. M. CAMERON, and H. J. SPAETH (1995). “Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices Revisited,” 57 Journal of Politics 812
44. SEGAL, J. A., and H. J. SPAETH (1993). The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press
45. SONGER, D. R. (2000). “Partisan Preferences, Contextual Influences, and the Impact of Changing Supreme Court Policy in High and Low Salience Cases.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago
46. SONGER, D. R., and S. HAIRE (1992). “Integrating Alternative Approaches to the Study of Judicial Voting: Obscenity Cases in the United States Court of Appeals,” 36 American Journal of Political Science 963
47. SONGER, D. R., J. A. SEGAL, and C. M. CAMERON (1994). “The Hierarchy of Justice: Testing a Principal-Agent Model of Supreme Court-Circuit Court Interactions,” 38 American Journal of Political Science 673
48. TRAUT, C. A., and C. F. EMMERT (1998). “Expanding the Integrated Model of Judicial Decision Making: The California Justices and Capital Punishment,” 60 Journal of Politics 1166