Judicial federalism after bush v. Gore: Some observations

Justice System Journal

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 45-55

  Solimine, Michael E ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036352954     PISSN: 0098261X     EISSN: 23277556     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0098261X.2002.10767657     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. BAKER, L. A., and E. A. YOUNG (2001). “Federalism and the Double Standard of Judicial Review,” 51 Duke Law Journal 75
2. BEISER, E. N. (1968). “A Comparative Analysis of State and Federal Judicial Behavior: The Reapportionment Cases,” 62 American Political Science Review 788
3. BLUME, J., and T. EISENBERG (1999). “Judicial Politics, Death Penalty Appeals, and Case Selection: An Empirical Study,” 72 Southern California Law Review 465
4. BRACE, P., and M. G. HALL (2000). “Comparing Courts Using American States,” 83 Judicature 350
5. BRACE, P., M. G. HALL, and L. LANGER (2001). “Placing State Supreme Courts in State Politics,” 1 State Politics and Policy Quarterly 81
6. BRENNAN, W. J. JR. (1977). “State Constitutions and the Protection of Individual Rights,” 90 Harvard Law Review 489
7. BRIGHT, S. B. (2000). “Elected Judges and the Death Penalty in Texas: Why Full Habeas Corpus Review by Independent Federal Judges Is Indispensable to Protecting Constitutional Rights,” 78 Texas Law Review 1805
8. BRIGHT, S. B., and P. J. KEENAN (1995). “Judges and the Politics of Death: Deciding Between the Bill of Rights and the Next Election in Capital Cases,” 75 Boston University Law Review 759
9. BUCKLEY, F. H. (2000). “Liberal Nationalism,” 48 UCLA Law Review 221
10. CARRINGTON, P. D. (1998). “Judicial Independence and Democratic Accountability in Highest State Courts,” 61:3 Law and Contemporary Problems 79
11. CAUTHEN, J. N. G. (2000). “Expanding Rights Under State Constitutions: A Quantitative Appraisal,” 63 Albany Law Review 1183
12. CROSS, F. B. (2000). “Institutions and Enforcement of the Bill of Rights,” 85 Cornell Law Review 1529
13. CROSS, F. B. (1997). “Political Science and the New Legal Realism: A Case of Unfortunate Interdisciplinary Ignorance,” 92 Northwestern University Law Review 251
14. GALANTER, M. (1974). “Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change,” 9 Law and Society Review 95
15. GARDNER, J. A. (1996). “The ‘States-as-Laboratories’ Metaphor in State Constitutional Law,” 30 Valparaiso University Law Review 475
16. GERRY, B. C. (1999). “Parity Revisited: An Empirical Comparison of State and Lower Federal Court Interpretations of Nollan v. California Coastal Commission,” 23 Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 233
17. GREVE, M. S. (1999). Real Federalism: Why It Matters, How It Could Happen. Washington, DC: AEI Press
18. HAMILTON, M. A. (2001). “The Elusive Safeguards of Federalism,” 574 Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 93
19. HARRIGER, K. J. (1997). “The Federalism Debate in the Transformation of Federal Habeas Corpus Law,” 27:3 Publius: The Journal of Federalism 1
20. HAUCK, B. (2001). “Note, Federal Court Involvement in Redistricting Litigation,” 114 Harvard Law Review 878
21. HELLMAN, A. D. (1996). “The Shrunken Docket of the Rehnquist Court,” Supreme Court Review 403
22. HEBERT, J. G. (2000). “Redistricting in the Post-2000 Era,” 8 George Mason Law Review 431
23. HERSHKOFF, H. (2001). “State Courts and the ‘Passive Virtues’: Rethinking the Judicial Function,” 114 Harvard Law Review 1834
24. HICKEY, A. (2002). “Note, Between Two Spheres: Comparing State and Federal Approaches to the Right to Privacy and Prohibitions Against Sodomy,” 111 Yale Law Journal 993
25. HILLS, R. M. JR. (2001). “The Eleventh Amendment as Curb on Bureaucratic Power,” 53 Stanford Law Review 1311
26. ISSACHAROFF, S., P. S. KARLAN, and R. N. PILDES (2001). When Elections Go Bad: The Law of Democracy and the Presidential Election of2000. New York: Foundation Press
27. JENSEN, L. S. (2000). “Federalism, Individual Rights, and the Conditional Spending Conundrum,” 33 Polity 259
28. LEE, E. T. (1999). “On the Received Wisdom in Federal Courts,” 147 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1111
29. LIEBMAN, J. S. (2000). “The Overproduction of Death,” 100 Columbia Law Review 20-30
30. LIEBMAN, J. S., J. FAGAN, V. WEST, and J. LLOYD (2000). “Capital Attrition: Error Rates in Capital Cases, 1973-1999,” 78 Texas Law Review 18-39
31. LLOYD, R. D. (1995). “Separating Partisanship from Party in Judicial Research: Reapportionment in the U.S. District Courts,” 89 American Political Science Review 413
32. MCMULLEN, J. L. (2000). “Setting the U.S. Supreme Court’s Agenda: Strategy and the Decision to Appeal.” Presented at the 2000 Conference on the Scientific Study of Judicial Politics, October 19-21, Columbus, Ohio
33. MOONEY, C. Z. (2000). “The Decline of Federalism and the Rise of Morality-Policy Conflict in the United States,” 30:1-2 Publius: The Journal of Federalism 171
34. NEUBORNE, B. (1977). “The Myth of Parity,” 90 Harvard Law Review 1105
35. NIVOLA, P. S. (2001). “Does Federalism Have a Future?” 142 Public Interest 44
36. NOTE (2001). “Non Sub Homine? A Survey and Analysis of the Legal Resolution of Election 2000,” 114 Harvard Law Review 2170
37. PINELLO, D. R. (2001). “The ‘Myth of Parity’ Revisited: An Empirical Test of Whether Federal Courts Protect Rights More Vigorously Than State Courts.” Presented at the 2001 Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, April 19-22, Chicago
38. POSNER, R. A. (1996). The Federal Courts: Challenge and Reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
39. PRAKASH, S. B., and J. C. YOO (2001). “The Puzzling Persistence of Process-based Federalism Theories,” 79 Texas Law Review 14-59
40. REDISH, M. H. (1990). Federal Jurisdiction: Tensions in the Allocation of Judicial Power, 2nd ed. Charlottesville, VA: Michie Company
41. RUBENSTEIN, W. B. (1999). “The Myth of Superiority,” 16 Constitutional Commentary 599
42. SMITH, G. B. (1999). “State Courts and Democracy: The Role of State Courts in the Battle for Inclusive Participation in the Electoral Process,” 74 New York University Law Review 937
43. SOLIMINE, M. E. (2002). “Supreme Court Review of State Court Decisions in the 21st Century,” 35 Indiana Law Review 335
44. SOLIMINE, M. E. (1996) “The Three-Judge District Court in Voting Rights Litigation,” 30 University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform 79
45. SOLIMINE, M. E., and J. L. WALKER (1999). Respecting State Courts: The Inevitability of Judicial Federalism. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press
46. TRIBE, L. H. (2000). “Let the Courts Decide,” New York Times, November 12, p. 15 (Week in Review)
47. VAIRO, G. M. (2001). “Forum Selection: Bush v. Gore,” National Law Journal, February 12, p. A16
48. WALTENBURG, E. N., and B. SWINFORD (1999). Litigating Federalism: The States Before the U.S. Supreme Court. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press
49. WAXMAN, S. P. (2001). “Foreword: Does the Solicitor General Matter?” 53 Stanford Law Review 1115
50. WOLFF, M. A. (2000). “Exploring Judicial Behaviors in the Laboratories of Democracy,” 83 Judicature 267
51. YACKLE, L. W. (1994). Reclaiming the Federal Courts. Cambridge: Harvard University Press