Some thoughts on the relation between behavior analysis and behavioral neuroscience

Psychological Record

Volumn 52, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 261-279

  Moore, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036344394     PISSN: 00332933     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03395429     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. On the invulnerability of behavior-analytic theory to biological research
2. Radical epiphenomenalism: B. F. Skinner's account of private events
3. Replicators, consequences, and displacement activities
4. On the relation between behavior analysis and biology
5. The S-R issue: Its status in behavior analysis and in Donahoe and Palmer's Learning and complex behavior
6. The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme
7. On mentalism, methodological behaviorism, and radical behaviorism
8. On behaviorism, knowledge, and causal explanation
9. On the relation between behaviorism and cognitive psychology
10. Some thoughts on the S-R issue and the relation between behavior analysis and behavioral neuroscience
11. On behaviorism, theories, and hypothetical constructs
12. Varieties of scientific explanation
13. Words are not things
14. Perhaps the most difficult problem faced by behaviorism
15. The treatment of conscious content: Disorder at the heart of radical behaviorism
16. Is consciousness a brain process?
17. How is physiology relevant to behavior analysis?
18. Skinner on the "mental" and the "physical"
19. Behavior as a function of inner states and outer circumstances
20. The operational analysis of psychological terms
21. Psychology as the behaviorist views it
22. The use and misuse of Aristotle's four causes in psychology: A case of obscurum per obscurius