Toward defining situations objectively: A culture-level analysis of role dyads in Hong Kong and Australia

Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 363-379

  McAuley, Peta Cameron ^a   Bond, Michael Harris ^a   Kashima, Emiko ^b  

^a CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036339034     PISSN: 00220221     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/00222102033004001     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Biddle, B. J., & Thomas, E. J. (1966). Role theory: Concepts and research. New York: Wiley.
2. Bond, M. H. (1998). Managing culture in studies of communication: A futurescape. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 8, 31-49.
3. Chuang, Y. C. (1998). The cognitive structures of role norms in Taiwan. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 239-251.
4. Forgas, J. P. (1976). The perception of social episodes: Categorical and dimensional representations in two different social milieus, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 199-209.
5. Forgas, J. P., & Bond, M. H. (1985). Cultural influences on the perception of interaction episodes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 75-88.
6. Gao, G. (1996). Self and other: A Chinese perspective on interpersonal relationships. In W. B. Gudykunst, S. Ting-Tomey, & T. Nishida (Eds.), Communication in personal relationships across cultures (pp. 81-101). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Goldberg, L. R., & Digman, J. M. (1994). Revealing structure in the data: Principles of exploratory factor analysis. In S. Strack & M. Lorr (Eds.), Differentiating normal and abnormal personality (pp. 216-242). New York: Springer.
8. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
9. Hofstede, G. (1995). Multilevel research of human systems: Flowers, bouquets and gardens. Human Systems Management, 14, 207-217.
10. Hofstede, G., Neuijen, B., Ohayv, D. D., & Sanders, G. (1990). Measuring organizational cultures: A qualitative and quantitative study across twenty cases. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 286-316.
11. Jaccard, J., & Dittus, P. (1990). Idiographic and nomothetic perspectives on research methods and data analysis. In C. Hendrick & M. S. Clark (Eds.), Research methods in personality and social psychology (pp. 312-350). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12. James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85-98.
13. Linton, R. (1936). The study of man. New York: Appleton-Century.
14. Marwell, G., & Hage, J. (1970). The organization of role-relationships: A systematic description. American Sociological Review, 35, 884-900.
15. Pervin, L. A. (1976). A free-response description approach to the analysis of person-situation interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 465-474.
16. Pervin, L. (1986). Persons, situations, interactions: Perspectives on a recurrent issue. In A. Campbell & J. J. Gibb (Eds.), Violent transactions: The limits of personality (pp. 15-26). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
17. Pervin, L. A. (1996). Personality: A view of the future based on a look at the past. Journal of Research in Personality, 30, 309-318.
18. Seeman, M. (1997). The neglected, elusive situation in social psychology. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60, 4-13.
19. Shoda, Y., & Mischel, W. (1996). Towards a unified, intra-individual dynamic conception of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 30, 414-428.
20. Ten Berge, J.M.F. (1986). Rotatie naar perfects congruentie en de multipele groep methode. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie, 41, 218-225.
21. Triandis, H. C. (1977). Interpersonal behavior. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
22. Triandis, H. C., McGuire, H., Saral, T., Yang, K., Loh, W., & Vassiliou, V. (1972). Across-cultural study of role perception. In H. C. Triandis (Ed.), The analysis of subjective culture (chap. 8). New York: Wiley.
23. Triandis, H. C., Vassiliou, V., & Nassiakou, M. (1968). Three cross-cultural studies of subjective culture. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monograph, 8(Pt. 2), 1-42.
24. Tucker, L. R. (1951). A method of synthesis of factor analysis studies (Personnel Research Section Report No. 984). Washington, DC: Dept. of the Army.
25. van de Vijver, F.J.R., & Poortinga, Y. H. (1994). Methodological issues in cross-cultural studies on parental rearing behavior and psychopathology. In C. Perris, W. A. Arrindell, & M. Eisemann (Eds.), Parental rearing and psychopathology (pp. 173-197). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
26. Yang, K. S. (1970). Authoritarianism and evaluation of appropriateness of role behavior. Journal of Social Psychology, 80, 171-181.