The effects of asynchronous computer-mediated group interaction on group processes

Social Science Computer Review

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 260-274

  Taylor, Jacqui ^a   MacDonald, John ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Computer mediated communication; Deindividuation; e mail; Social identity

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036338156     PISSN: 08944393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/08939302020003004     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Birnbaum, M. H. (2001). Introduction to behavioural research on the Internet. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2. Cathcart, R. S., & Samovar, L. A. (1992). Small group communication (6th ed.). Dubuque, IA: WCB.
3. Douglas, K. M., & McGarty, C. (2001). Identifiability and self-presentation: CMC and intergroup interaction. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 399-416.
4. Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S., & Sethna, B. N. (1991). The equalisation phenomenon. Human-Computer Interaction, 6, 119-146.
5. Elias, F. G., Johnson, M. E., & Fortman, J. B. (1989). Task-focused self-disclosure: Effects on group cohesiveness, commitment to task and productivity. Small Group Behaviour, 20, 87-96.
6. Friedman, E. J., Kahn, P. H., & Howe, D. C. (2000). Trust online. Communications of the ACM, 43(12), 34-40.
7. Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1992). Social identifications. London: Routledge.
8. Holmes, M. E. (1995). Don't blink or you'll miss it: Issues in e-mail research. In B. R. Burleson (Ed.), Communication yearbook 18 (pp. 454-463). London: Sage.
9. Huber, G. P. (1990). A theory of the effects of advanced information technology on organizational design, intelligence, and decision-making. Academy of Management Review, 15, 47-71.
10. Huff, C. W., & King, R. (1988). An experiment in electronic collaboration. In J. D. Goodchilds (Chair), Interacting by computer: Effects on small group style and structure. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Atlanta, GA.
11. Kiesler, S., & Sproull, L. (1986). Response effects in the electronic survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 50, 402-413.
12. Lea, M. (1992). Contexts of computer-mediated communication. London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
13. Lea, M., O'Shea, T., Fung, P., & Spears, R. (1992). "Flaming" in computer-mediated communication. In M. Lea (Ed.), Contexts of computer-mediated communication (pp. 89-112). London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
14. Lea, M., & Spears, R. (1991). Computer-mediated communication, de-individuation and group decision-making. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34, 283-301.
15. Lyytinen, K., Maaranen, P., & Knuuttila, J. (1994). Groups are not always the same: An analysis of group behaviours in electronic meeting systems. CSCW, 2, 261-284.
16. Matheson, K. (1992). Women and computer technology. In M. Lea (Ed.), Contexts of computer-mediated communication (pp. 66-87). London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
17. McGrath, J. E., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1993). Putting the "group" back in group support systems: Some theoretical issues about dynamic processes in groups with technological enhancements. In L. M. Jessup & J. S. Valacich (Eds.), Group support systems (pp. 78-96). New York: Macmillan.
18. McGuire, T. W., Kiesler, S., & Siegal, J. (1987). Group and computer-mediated discussion effects in risk decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 917-930.
19. McLeod, P. (1997). The eyes have it: Minority influence in face-to-face and computer-mediated group discussion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 706-718.
20. Miranda, S. M. (1994). Avoidance of groupthink. Small Group Research, 25, 105-136.
21. Mudrack, P. E. (1989). Defining group cohesiveness. Small Group Behaviour, 20, 37-49.
22. Myers, D. G., & Lamm, H. (1976). The group polarization phenomenon. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 602-627.
23. Olivero, N., & Lunt, P. (2001, November 7-9). Self-disclosure in e-commerce exchanges: Relationships among trust, reward and awareness. Paper presented at the Psychology and the Internet Conference, Famborough, UK.
24. Postmes, T., Spears, R., Lea, M., & Reicher, S. (Eds.). (2000). SIDE issues centre stage. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.
25. Reicher, S. D. (1984). Social influence in the crowd: Attitudinal and behavioural effects of de-individuation in conditions of high and low group salience. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 341-350.
26. Smolensky, M. W., Carmody, M. A., & Halcomb, C. (1990). The influence of task type, group structure and extraversion on uninhibited speech in CMC. Computers in Human Behaviour, 6, 261-272.
27. Sosik, J. J., Avollo, B. J., Kahai, S. S., & Jung, D. I. (1998). Computer-supported work group potency and effectiveness: The role of transformational leadership, anonymity and task interdependence. Computers in Human Behavior, 14, 491-511.
28. Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1994). Panacea or panopticon? Communication Research, 21, 427-459.
29. Spears, R., Lea, M., & Lee, S. (1990). De-individuation and group polarisation in computer-mediated communication. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 121-134.
30. Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1991). Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization. London: MIT Press.
31. Steele, G. L. (1983). The hacker's dictionary. New York: Harper & Row.
32. Straus, S. G. (1997). Technology, group process and group outcomes: Testing the connections in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups. Human-Computer Interaction, 12, 227-266.
33. Sudweeks, F., McLaughlin, M., & Rafaeli, S. (Eds.). (2000). Network and netplay: Virtual groups on the Internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
35. Taylor, J., & MacDonald, J. (1994). The effects of electronic interactions on group and individual communication processes. Journal of Intelligent Systems, 4, 113-132.
36. Taylor, J., & MacDonald, J. (2002). A discussion of the changes that occur in computer-mediated groups over time. Manuscript in preparation.
37. Thomson, R., & Murachver, T. (2001). Predicting gender from electronic discourse. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 193-208.
38. Turner, J. C. (1983). Some comments on ... "the measurement of social orientations in the minimal group paradigm." European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 351-367.
39. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherall, M.S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorisation theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
40. Walther, J. B. (1997). Group and interpersonal effects in international computer-mediated collaboration. Human Communication Research, 23, 342-369.