Comparison of buoyancy, passive and net active drag forces between Fastskin™ and standard swimsuits

Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 115-123

  Benjanuvatra, N ^a   Dawson, G ^a   Blanksby, B A ^a   Elliott, B C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLOTHING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYDRODYNAMICS; HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE; MALE; SWIMMING; SWIMSUIT; VELOCITY;

EID: 0036314190     PISSN: 14402440     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1440-2440(02)80032-9     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Passive drag is still a good evaluator of swimming aptitude
2. The contribution of passive drag as a determinant of swimming performance
3. Wet suit effect: A comparison between competitive swimmers and triathletes
4. Human morphology and hydrodynamics
5. Human body dimensions and applied hydrodynamics: Selection criteria for top swimmers
6. Wetsuits, body density and swimming performance
7. Natural and artificial buoyancy, flotation and body balance in the water
8. Hydrodynamic characteristics of competitive swimmers of different genders and performance levels
9. Investigating kinetics in the freestyle flip turn push-off
10. An instrument for quantifying the hydrodynamic drag of swimmers - A technical note
11. Net forces in underwater streamlined gliding and kicking techniques during the freestyle turn
12. Sex differences in the centre of buoyancy location of competitive swimmers
13. A re-evaluation of forces in swimming
14. The long suit - A serious threat to the very nature of competitive swimming or not?
15. Influence of body hair removal on physiologic responses during breaststroke swimming
16. Swimming biomechanics: Part 1