Supporting accountability in the field of mediation

Negotiation Journal

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 29-49

  Herrman, Margaret S ^a   Hollett, Nancy ^a   Eaker, Dawn Goettler ^a   Gale, Jerry ^a   Foster, Mark ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b Vinson Institute of Government   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036299714     PISSN: 07484526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1014937704551     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. Academy of Family Mediators. 1998. Standards of Practice for Family and Divorce Mediation. Lexington, Mass.: Academy of Family Mediators.
2. American Arbitration Association, American Bar Association, Society of Professionals in Dispute Resolution. 1995. Model standards of conduct for mediators. New York and Washington: American Arbitration Association, American Bar Association, Society of Professionals in Dispute Resolution. (Note: The Society of Professionals in Dispute Resolution is now the Association for Conflict Resolution.)
3. Birkhoff, J. 2000. Mediator's perspectives on power: A window into a profession? Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Institute for Conflict Analysis and Resolution. George Mason University, Fairfax, Va..
4. Dingwall, R. 1993. Does caveat emptor alone help potential users of mediation? Negotiation Journal 9(4): 331-334.
5. Filner, B. and M. Jenkins. 1996. Performance-based evaluation of mediators: the San Diego Mediation Center's experience. San Francisco Law Review 30:647-663.
6. Filner, J. 2000. Certification issues outline: Voluntary mediator certification project. Unpublished document prepared by the Academy of Family Mediators (AFM) to fulfill grant obligations for the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. Available from AFM (now the Association for Conflict Resolution)..
7. Foster, M. R. 1998. Effective job analysis methods. In Handbook of human resource management, edited by S.E. Condrey. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass..
8. Friedman, M. 1962. Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9. Gael, S. 1988. Interviews, questionnaires, and check lists. In The job analysis handbook for business, industry, and government, edited by S. Gael. New York: Wiley.
10. Gentry, D. B. 1994. The certification movement: Past, present, and future. Mediation Quarterly 11(3): 285-291.
11. Goettler, D. E., M. S. Herrman, and J. Gale. 1999. Background characteristics and incentives of mediators in Georgia: Exploring differences in public, private, and government agency mediators. Mediation Quarterly 16(3): 221-233.
12. Gross, S. J. 1978. The myth of professional licensing. The American Psychologist 34:9-16.
13. Hamm, M. M. 1997. The Fundamentals of Accreditation, Washington: ASAE.
14. Herrman, M.S., N. Hollett, J. Gale, and M. Foster. 2001. Defining mediator knowledge and skills. Negotiation Journal 17 (2): 139-153.
15. Hollett, N.L., D. G. Eaker, M.S. Herrman, and J. Gale. 2000. Mediator Skills Project/Academy of Family Mediators job analysis manual: Methodology and results. Unpublished manual available from the Mediator Skills Project, Vinson Institute, University of Georgia.
16. Honeyman, C. 1990. On evaluating mediators. Negotiation Journal 6(1): 23-36.
17. - 1993. A consensus on mediators' qualifications. Negotiation Journal 9(4): 295-299.
18. Kolb, D. M. and Associates. 1994. When talk works: Profiles of mediators. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
19. Kolb, D. M. and J. E. Kolb. 1993. All the mediators in the garden. Negotiation Journal 9(4): 335-339.
20. Kruk, E. 1998. Practice issues, strategies, and models: The current state of the art of family mediation. Family and Conciliation Courts Review 36(2): 195-215.
21. McCormick, E. J. 1976. Job and task analysis. In Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, edited by M.D. Dunnette. Chicago: Rand McNally.
22. Milne, A. L. 1984. The development of parameters of practice for divorce mediation. Mediation Quarterly 4(1): 49-59.
23. Neilson, L. C. and P. English. 1996. Practice, certification and training standards. Standards and Certification Committee, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada: Family Mediation Canada.
24. Rogers, N. H. and C. A. McEwen. 1994. Mediation: Law, policy, practice. Deerfield, Ill.: Clark Boardman Callaghan.
25. Schwerin, E. W. 1995. Mediation, citizen empowerment, and transformational politics. Westport, Conn.: Praeger.
26. Society of Professionals in Dispute Resolution Commission on Qualifications. 1989. Qualifying neutrals: The basic principles. SPIDR Commission on Qualifications Report, Washington: National Institute for Dispute Resolution.
27. Taylor, A. 1994. The four foundations of family mediation: Implications for training and certification. Mediation Quarterly 12(1): 77-88.
28. Test Design Project. 1993. Interim guidelines for selecting mediators. Washington: National Institute for Dispute Resolution.
29. - 1995. Performance-based asessment: A methodology, for use in selecting, training, and evaluating mediators. Washington: National Institute for Dispute Resolution.
30. Van Cott, H. P. and B. Paramore. 1988. Task analysis. In The job analysis handbook for business, industry, and government, edited by S. Gael. New York: Wiley.