Epidural analgesia does not prolong the third stage of labour

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia

Volumn 49, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 490-492

  Rosaeg, Ola P ^a   Campbell, Nicola ^a   Crossan, Mary Lou ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALGESIA; ARTICLE; CANADA; CONTROLLED STUDY; EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA; FEMALE; HUMAN; LABOR; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL RECORD; PLACENTA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

EID: 0036290587     PISSN: 0832610X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03017927     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Epidural versus non-epidural analgesia for pain relief in labour (Cochrane Review)
2. Effect of epidural vs parenteral opioid analgesia on the progress of labor. A meta-analysis
3. Epidural analgesia in association with duration of labor and mode of delivery: A quantitative review
4. Randomized controlled comparison of epidural bupivacaine versus pethidine for analgesia in labour
5. The effect of continuous low-dose epidural analgesia on uterine work during the active phase of the first stage of labour
6. Epidural analgesia and uterine function
7. Epidural analgesia for labor pain is not associated with a decreased frequency of uterine activity
8. Effect of epidural analgesia on fundal dominance during spontaneous active-phase nulliparous labor
9. Epidural analgesia need not increase operative delivery rates
10. A comparison of 'active' and 'physiological' management of the third stage of labour
11. Active versus expectant management of third stage of labour: The Hinchingbrooke randomised controlled trial
12. Controlled cord traction versus minimal intervention techniques in delivery of the placenta: A randomized controlled trial
13. Active versus expectant management in the third stage of labour (Cochrane Review)