Is propess a better method of induction of labour in nulliparous women?

Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 294-295

  Mukhopadhyay, M ^a   Lim, K J H ^a   Fairlie, F M ^a  

^a NONE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROSTAGLANDIN E2;

ADULT; AMNIOTOMY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED DRUG RELEASE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DRUG EFFECT; FEMALE; FETOPLACENTAL UNIT; GEL; HUMAN; LABOR INDUCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NULLIPARA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SLOW RELEASE FORMULATION; VAGINA PESSARY;

DELAYED-ACTION PREPARATIONS; DINOPROSTONE; FEMALE; GELS; HUMANS; LABOR, INDUCED; OXYTOCICS; PARITY; PESSARIES; PREGNANCY;

EID: 0036280107     PISSN: 01443615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01443610220130607     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. An economic analysis of the cost of labour induction with dinoprostone
2. 2 pessary for cervical ripening and initiation of labour at term
3. 2 pessary with a retrieval system for the induction of labour
4. 2 in a controlled release vaginal pessary for cervical ripening at term