The employment interview via the telephone: Are we sacrificing accurate personality judgments for cost efficiency?

Journal of Research in Personality

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 208-223

  Blackman, Melinda C ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036275526     PISSN: 00926566     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jrpe.2001.2347     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis
2. Predicting more of the people more of the time: Assessing the personality of the situation
3. Personality judgment and the utility of the unstructured employment interview
4. The effects of observation vs. participation on the accuracy of personality judgments
5. The effect of information on the accuracy and consensus of personality judgments
6. Effective interview practices for accurately predicting job candidates' counterproductive traits
7. The Q-sort method in personality assessment and psychiatric research
8. Just how effective is a telephone interview?
9. On the accuracy of personality judgment: A realistic approach
10. A comparison of Q-sort and Likert rating methods of personality assessment
11. Criterion-related validities of personality constructs and the effect of response distortions on those validities
12. Influence of nonverbal communication and rater proximity on impressions and decisions in simulated employment interviews
13. Aural and visual sources of validity in structured employment interviews
14. Personality-impression formation as a function of visual cues and set
15. A cross-modal comparison of telephone and face-to-face selection interviews in graduate recruitment
16. Personality measures as predictors of job performances: A meta-analytic review
17. Visual cues and verbal content as influences on impressions formed after simulated employment interviews
18. The impact of presentation mode and disfluency on judgments about speakers
19. Effects of attractiveness and maturity of face and voice on interpersonal impressions