Randomized clinical trial of Ligasure™ versus open haemorrhoidectomy (Br J Surg 2002; 89: 154-7) [8]

British Journal of Surgery

Volumn 89, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 812-

  Arumugam, P J ^a  

^a SINGLETON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANUS SPHINCTER; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIATHERMY; ECHOGRAPHY; HEMORRHOID; HEMORRHOIDECTOMY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LETTER; MANOMETRY; MUSCLE INJURY; PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCLEROTHERAPY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

ELECTROCOAGULATION; HEMORRHOIDS; HUMANS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS;

EID: 0036274764     PISSN: 00071323     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02127_13.x     Document Type: Letter

References (2)

1. Prospective, randomized trial comparing pain and clinical function after conventional scissors excision/ligation versus diathermy excision without ligation for symptomatic prolapsed hemorrhoids
2. Evidence-based practice in haemorrhoidectomy