![]() |
Volumn 133, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 813-818
|
Comparability of proptosis measurements by different techniques
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
CLINICAL ARTICLE;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY;
EXOPHTHALMOS;
EXOPHTHALOMETER;
EYE DISEASE;
GRAVES DISEASE;
HUMAN;
INSTRUMENT;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
MEASUREMENT;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
TECHNIQUE;
VARIANCE;
COHORT STUDIES;
DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL;
ENDOCRINOLOGY;
EXOPHTHALMOS;
GRAVES DISEASE;
HUMANS;
OBSERVER VARIATION;
OPHTHALMOLOGY;
ORBIT;
PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;
TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;
|
EID: 0036267213
PISSN: 00029394
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9394(02)01429-0 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (44)
|
References (22)
|