Changing attitudes towards third-party reproductive techniques

Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 289-292

  Greenfeld, Dorothy A ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDE; DONOR; GAMETE; OOCYTE DONATION; PATIENT INFORMATION; POLICY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGENY; PUBLIC OPINION; REPRODUCTION; REVIEW; SPERM DONOR; WELLBEING;

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; DISCLOSURE; EUROPE; FEMALE; HUMANS; OOCYTE DONATION; PREGNANCY;

EID: 0036266066     PISSN: 1040872X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00001703-200206000-00007     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. 1993 Results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry
2. 1998 Results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry
3. Embryo donation programs and policies in North America: Survey results and implications for health and mental health professionals
4. Young women wanted
5. An attempt to reconstruct children's donor concept: A comparison between children's and lesbian parents' attitudes toward donor anonymity
6. Sharing information with donor insemination offspring
7. Should offspring from donated gametes continue to be denied knowledge of their opinions and antecedents?
8. Gamete donation and anonymity: The ethical and legal debate
9. Dutch sperm donors will remain anonymous for another two years
10. The double track policy for donor anonymity
11. Guidelines for gamete donation
12. To give or sell human gametes - The interplay between pragmatics, policy and ethics
13. Financial incentives for donors
14. Oocyte donor screening: The selection process and cost analysis
15. A follow-up study with oocyte donors exploring their experiences, knowledge, and attitudes about the use of their oocytes and the outcome of the donation
16. Third party reproduction and the internet
17. Disclosure to children conceived with donor gametes should not be optional
18. Disclosure to children conceived with donor gametes should be optional
19. Disclosure of donor insemination to the child: The impact of Swedish legislation on couples' attitudes