Alignable and nonalignable differences in causal explanations

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 456-468

  McGill, Ann L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; RATING SCALE; RESEARCH; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 0036264036     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194946     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Context-independent and context-dependent information in concepts
2. Judging probable cause
3. The structure mapping engine: Algorithm and examples
4. Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy
5. The mechanisms of analogical learning
6. Structural alignment in comparison: No difference without similarity
7. The role of similarity in categorization: Providing groundwork
8. Relational similarity and the nonindependence of features in similarity judgments
9. Knowledge-based causal attribution: The abnormal conditions focus model
10. An overview of the Copycat project
11. Analogical mapping by constraint satisfaction
12. The evaluability hypothesis: An explanation of preference reversals between separate and joint evaluation of alternatives
13. Preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of options: A review and theoretical analysis
14. Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives
15. Analogical mechanisms
16. Alignability and attribute importance in choice
17. Splitting the difference: A structural alignment view of similarity
18. Structural alignment during similarity' comparisons
19. Commonalities and differences in similarity comparisons
20. Similarity and alignment in choice
21. Context effects in judgments of causation
22. Selection of a causal background: Role of expectation versus feature mutability
23. Respects for similarity
24. Gender gaps Who needs to be explained?
25. The role of attribute knowledge and overall evaluation in comparative judgment
26. Dimensional commensurability and cue utilization in comparative judgment
27. Features of similarity
28. Overcoming the early entrant advantage: The role of alignable and nonalignable differences