Evaluation of colposcopically directed cervical biopsies yielding a histologic diagnosis of CIN 1,2

Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 80-83

  Molloy, Christine ^a   Dunton, Charles ^a   Edmonds, Pamela ^a   Cunnane, Mary F ^a   Jenkins, Thomas ^a  

^a THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; Excisional biopsy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOPSY TECHNIQUE; CANCER CLASSIFICATION; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER GRADING; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLPOSCOPY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; EVALUATION; EXCISION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; HYSTERECTOMY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OBSERVER VARIATION; PREDICTION; PROGNOSIS; RELIABILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UTERINE CERVIX BIOPSY; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU;

EID: 0036262236     PISSN: 10892591     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00128360-200204000-00003     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Colposcopic diagnosis of cervical neoplasia
2. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
3. A modified terminology for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
4. Natural history of dysplasia of the uterine cervix
5. Comparison of the grade of CIN 1n colposcopically directed biopsies with that in outpatient loop electrosurgical excision procedure (Leep) specimens
6. Indications for cone biopsy: Pathologic correlation
7. The correlation between the grade of dyskaryosis on cervical smear, grade of cervical intraepithelial lesion (CIN) on punch biopsy and the final histological diagnosis on cone biopsies of the cervix
8. Correlation between colposcopically directed biopsy and cervical loop excision
9. Colposcopically directed punch biopsy: A potentially misleading investigation
10. Reporting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN): Intra- and interpathologist variation and factors associated with disagreement
11. Interobserver reproducibility of cervical cytologic and histologic interpretations: Realistic estimates from the ASCUS-LSIL triage study