Review of a pilot quality-assessment program for interpretative comments

Annals of Clinical Biochemistry

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 250-260

  Vasikaran, S D ^a   Penberthy, L ^b   Gill, J ^b   Scott, S ^b   Sikaris, K ^c  

^a ROYAL PERTH HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b RCPA AACB Chemical Pathology Group   (Australia)

^c Dorevitch Pathology   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BLOOD CHEMISTRY; CONTINUING EDUCATION; HUMAN; LABORATORY; MEDICAL RECORD; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; REVIEW; SEMANTICS;

AGED; CHEMISTRY, CLINICAL; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, CONTINUING; FEMALE; FORMS AND RECORDS CONTROL; HUMANS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MALE; MEDICAL RECORDS; MIDDLE AGED; PILOT PROJECTS; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE;

EID: 0036260885     PISSN: 00045632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/0004563021901955     Document Type: Review

References (5)

1. Assessing the quality of comments on reports: A retrospective study
2. Experience with assessing the quality of comments on clinical biochemistry reports
3. Provision of interpretative comments on biochemical report forms
4. Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus provisional report of a WHO consultation
5. New classification and criteria for diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Position Statement from the Australian Diabetes Society, New Zealand Society for the Study of Diabetes, Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia and Australasian Association of Clinical Biochemists