The Permeable City: Toronto’s Spatial Shift at the Turn of the Millennium

Professional Geographer

Volumn 54, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 190-203

  Donald, Betsy ^a  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Economic geography; Political geography; Toronto

Indexed keywords

GOVERNANCE APPROACH; POLITICAL CHANGE; POLITICAL SYSTEM; URBAN POLITICS;

CANADA;

EID: 0036259120     PISSN: 00330124     EISSN: 14679272     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/0033-0124.00325     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Aglietta, M. 1987. A theory of capitalist regulation: The U.S. experience. London: Verso.
2. Amin, A. 1994. Post-Fordism: Models, fantasies, and phantoms of transition. In Post-Fordism: A reader, ed. A. Amin, 1-39. London: Blackwell Publishers.
3. Boudreau, J. 1999. Megacity Toronto: Struggles over differing aspects of middle-class politics. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research December: 771-81.
4. Boudreau, J. 2000. The megacity saga: democracy and citizenship in this global age. Montreal: Black Rose Books.
5. Bourne, L.S. 1997. Governance, efficiency and so-cial equity in large urban agglomerations: Exam-ples from the recent Toronto experience. Paper presented at International Geographical Union, 10-16 August, Mexico City, Mexico.
6. Bourne, L. S., S. Starkweather, and R. Basu. 2000. People and places: A portrait of the evolving social character of the Greater Toronto Region. Toronto: Neptis Foundation and Department of Geography, Uni-versity of Toronto.
7. Boyer, R. 1990. The Regulation School: A critical introduction. New York: Columbia University Press.
8. Cameron, D., and R. Simeon. 1997. Ontario in con-federation: The not-so-friendly giant. In The gov-ernment and politics of Ontario, ed. G. White, 158-85. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
9. Courchene, T. with T. J. Telmer. 1998. From heartland to North American region state: The social, fiscal and federal evolution of Ontario. Monograph Series on Public Policy. Toronto: Centre for Public Management, University of Toronto.
10. Donald, B. 1999. Economic change and city-region governance: The case of Toronto. Ph.D. diss, De-partment of Geography, University of Toronto.
11. Filion, P. 1995. Fordism, post-Fordism, and urban policy-making: Urban renewal in a medium-sized Canadian city. Canadian Journal of Urban Research 4:43-71.
12. Frisken, F. 1994. The changing Canadian metropolis: A public policy perspective. Berkeley: Institute of Gov-ernmental Studies Press; Toronto: The Canadian Urban Institute.
13. Frisken, F., L. S. Bourne, G. Gad, and R. A. Murdie. 1997. Governance and social well-being in the Toronto area: Past achievements and future challenges. Research Paper 193. Toronto: Centre for Urban and Community Studies, University of Toronto.
14. Gertler, M. S. 2000. Self-determination for Toronto: What are the economic conditions and do they exist? In Toronto: Considering self-government, ed. M. W. Rowe, 33-53. Owen Sound, Ontario: The Ginger Press.
15. Gertler, M. S., Y. Levitte, D. Moylan, and G. Spencer. 2000. A region in transition: The changing structure of Toronto' regional economy. Toronto: Neptis Foundation and Department of Geography, Uni-versity of Toronto.
16. Goodwin, M. 1996. Governing the spaces of difference: Regulation and globalization in London. Urban Studies 33 (8): 1395-1406.
17. Goodwin, M., and J. Painter. 1996. Local governance, the crises of Fordism, and the changing ge-ographies of regulation. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 21 (4): 635-48.
18. Goodwin, M., and P. Painter. 1997. Concrete re-search, urban regimes, and regulation theory. In Reconstructing urban regime theory: Regulating urban politics in a global economy, ed. M. Lauria, 13-29. London: Sage Publications.
19. Graham, K. A., and S. D. Phillips. 1998. “Who does what” in Ontario: The process of provincial-municipal disentanglement. Canadian Public Ad-ministration 41 (2): 175-209.
20. Greater Toronto Area Task Force. 1996. Report on the Greater Toronto Area Task Force. Toronto: Queen’s Printer for Ontario.
21. Greater Toronto Charter. http://www.torontochar-ter.com (last accessed 9 January 2002).
22. Harris, R. 1986. Boom and bust: The effects of house price inflation on homeownership patterns in Montreal, Toronto, and Vancouver. The Canadian Geographer 30 (4): 302-315.
23. Isin, E. F. 1998. Governing Toronto without govern-ment: Liberalism and neoliberalism. Studies in Political Economy 56: 169-91.
24. Jenson, J. 1989. “Different,” but not “exceptional”: Canada’s permeable fordism. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 26 (1): 69-94.
25. Jessop, B. 1990. Regulation theories in retrospect and prospect. Economy and Society 19 (2): 153-216.
26. Keil, R. 1998. Toronto in the 1990s: Dissociated governance? Studies in Political Economy 56:151-67.
27. Keil, R. 2000. Governance restructuring in Los Angeles and Toronto: Amalgamation or secession? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 24 (4): 758-81.
28. Lauria, M., ed. 1997. Reconstructing urban regime theory: Regulating urban politics in a global economy. London: Sage Publications.
29. Lemon, J. T. 1985. Toronto since 1918: An illustrated history. Toronto: James Lorimer & Company Publishers.
30. Ley, D. 1988. Social upgrading in six Canadian inner cities. The Canadian Geographer 32 (1): 31-45.
31. Lipietz, A. 1987. Mirages and miracles. London: Verso
32. MacLeod, G., and M. Goodwin. 1999. Space, scale, and state strategy: Rethinking urban and regional governance. Progress in Human Geography 23 (4): 503-27.
33. Noel, A. 1987. Accumulation, regulation, and social change: An essay on French Political Economy. International Organization 21 (2): 303-33.
34. Ontario Chief Election Officer. 1985. General election: Election returns with statistics from the records. Ontario: Queen’s Printer.
35. Ontario Chief Election Officer. 1987. General election: Election returns with statistics from the records. Ontario: Queen’s Printer.
36. Ontario Chief Election Officer. 1990. General election: Election returns with statistics from the records. Ontario: Queen’s Printer.
37. Ontario Chief Election Officer. 1995. General election: Election returns with statistics from the records. Ontario: Queen’s Printer.
38. Painter, J. 1995. Regulation theory, post-fordism, and urban politics. In Theories of urban politics, ed. D. Judge, G. Stoker, and H. Wolman, 276-95. London: Sage Publications.
39. Painter, J. 1997. Regulation, regime, and practice in urban politics. In Reconstructing urban regime theory: Regulating urban politics in a global economy, ed. M. Lauria, 122-43. London: Sage Publications.
40. Peck, J., and A. Tickell. 1994. Searching for a new in-stitutional fix: The after-Fordist crisis and the global-local disorder. In Post-Fordism: A reader, ed. A. Amin. London: Blackwell Publishers.
41. Rowe, M. W., ed. 2000. Toronto: Considering selfgovernment. Owen Sound: The Ginger Press. Sharpe, L. J. 1995. Is there a case for metropolitan government? In Urban regions in a global context: Directions for the Greater Toronto Area, ed. J. K. Bell and S. Webber, 83-102. Toronto: Centre for Urban and Community Studies and Program in Planning, University of Toronto.
42. Slack, E. 2000. Municipal finance and governance in the Greater Toronto Area. Toronto: Neptis Foundation and Department of Geography, University of Toronto.
43. Smiley, D. V 1975. Canada and the quest for a national policy. Canadian Journal of Political Science 8:40-62.
44. Tickell, A., and J. A. Peck. 1992. Accumulation, regulation, and the geographies of post-Fordism: Missing links in regulationist research. Progress in Human Geography 16 (2): 190-218.
45. Tickell, A., and J. A. Peck. 1995. Social regulation after Fordism: Regulation theory, neoliberalism, and the global-local nexus. Economy and Society 24 (3): 357-86.
46. Todd, G. 1998. Megacity: Globalization and governance in Toronto. Studies in Political Economy 56:193-216.