A data visualization procedure for the evaluation of group treatment outcomes across units of analysis

Small Group Research

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 209-232

  Patterson, David A ^a   Basham, Randall E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036253225     PISSN: 10464964     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/104649640203300203     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Beck, A. P., & Lewis, C. M. (2000). The process of group psychotherapy: Systems for analyzing change. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
2. Bloom, M., Fischer, J., & Orme, J. G. (1999). Evaluating practice: Guidelines for the accountable professional (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
3. DeLucia-Waack, J. (1997). Measuring the effectiveness of group work: A review and analysis of process and outcome measures. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 22(4), 277-293.
4. Glisson, C. (1986). The group versus the individual as the unit of analysis in small group research. Research in Social Group Work, 9(3), 15-30.
5. Haber, R. B. (1988). Visualization in engineering mechanics: Techniques, systems and issues. Proceedings of ACM Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH '88): The Association of Computing Machinery: Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics, 22(4), 89-111.
6. Hill, C. E. (1990). Is individual therapy process really different from group therapy process? Counseling Psychologist, 18(1), 126-130.
7. Jayaratne, S. (1977). Single-subject and group designs in treatment evaluation. Social Work Research & Abstracts, 13(3), 35-42.
8. Kazi, M.A.F., Mantysaari, M., & Rostila, I. (1997). Promoting the use of single-case designs: Social work experiences from England and Finland. Research on Social Work Practice, 7(3), 311-328.
9. MacKenzie, R. (Ed.). (1995). Effective use of group therapy in managed care. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
10. Marsh, C. (1931). Group treatment of the psychosis by the psychological equivalent of the revival. Mental Hygiene, 15, 328-349.
11. Mattaini, M. A. (1993). More than a thousand words: Graphics for clinical practice. Washington, DC: National Association of Social Workers Press.
12. Mattaini, M. A. (1996). The abuse and neglect of single-case designs. Research on Social Work Practice, 6(1), 83-90.
13. Monette, D. R., Sullivan, T. J., & Dejong, C. R. (1990). Applied social research: Tool for the human services (2nd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
14. Nugent, W. R. (1996). Integrating single-case and group-comparison designs for evaluation research. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 32(2), 209-226.
15. O'Brien, W. H., Korchynsky, R., Fabrizio, J., McGrath, J., & Swank, A. (1999). Evaluating group process in a stress management intervention: Relationships between perceived process and cardiovascular reactivity to stress. Research on Social Work Practice, 9(5), 608-630.
16. Orme, J. G. (1991). Statistical conclusion validity for single-system designs. Social Service Review, 65, 468-491.
17. Patterson, D. A. (2000). Personal computer applications in the social services. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
18. Pratt, J. (1945). The group method in the treatment of psychosomatic disorders. Sociometry, 8, 323-331.
19. Reid, K. E. (1997). Social work practice with groups: A clinical perspective (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
20. Rose, S. D. (1989). Working with adults in groups: Integrating cognitive, behavioral and small group strategies. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21. Rubin, A., & Babbie, E. (1997). Research methods for social work (3rd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
22. Schneider, B. (Ed.). (1990). Organizational climate and culture. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
23. Smith, K. K., & White, G. L. (1983). Some alternatives to traditional social psychology of groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 65-73.
24. Smokowski, P. R., Rose, S., Todar, K., & Reardon, K. (1999). Postgroup-causality status, group events, and leader behavior: An early look into the dynamics of damaging group experiences. Research on Social Work Practice, 9(5), 555-574.
25. Spitz, H. I. (1996). Group psychotherapy and managed mental health care: A clinical guide for providers. New York: Bruner/Mazel.
26. Thyer, B., & Thyer, K. (1992). Single-system research designs in social work practice: A bibliography from 1965 to 1990. Research of Social Work Practice, 2(1), 99-116.
27. Tolman, R. M., & Molidor, C. E. (1994). A decade of social group work research: Trends in methodology, theory, and program development. Research on Social Work Practice, 4(2), 142-159.
28. Toseland, R. W., & Rivas, R. F. (1995). An introduction to group work practice (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
29. Tripodi, T. (1994). A primer on single subject design for clinical social workers. Washington, DC: National Association of Social Workers Press.
30. Tufte, E. R. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
31. Yalom, I. D. (1995). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy (4th ed.). New York: Basic Books.
32. Yu, C. H., & Behrens, J. T. (1995). Applications of multivariate visualization to behavioral sciences. Retrieved June 21, 2000, from http://research.ed.asu.edu/reports/multi-vis/multi-vis.html#what-is