Analyzing an innovative environment: San Diego as a bioscience beachhead

Economic Development Quarterly

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 99-114

  Walcott, Susan M ^a  

^a GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HIGH TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY; INDUSTRIAL AGGLOMERATION; INNOVATION; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0036248468     PISSN: 08912424     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0891242402016002001     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Arthur Anderson. LLP and Indiana Chamber of Commerce. (2000). Indiana venture capital study. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana Chamber of Commerce. Available from www.indianachamber.com/Venture_Summary.pdf
2. Audretsch, D. (1998). Agglomeration and the location of innovative activity. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 14, 18-29.
3. Audretsch, D., & Stephan, P. (2000). Company-scientist locational links: The case of biotechnology. The American Economic Review, 86, 641-652.
4. Aydalot, P., & Keeble, D. (1988). High technology industry and innovative environments: The European experience. London: Routledge.
5. Barnes, T. (1989). Structure and agency in economic geography and theories of economic value. In A. Kobayashi & S. Mackenzie (Eds. , Remaking human geography (pp. 134-148). London: Unwin Hyman.
6. Blakely, E., & Nishikawa, N. (1992). Incubating high technology firms: State economic development strategies for biotechnology. Economic Development Quarterly, 6, 241-254.
7. Bowie, N. (1994). University-business partnerships: An assessment. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
8. California Department of Commerce, Office of Economic Research. (1988, May). Technology transfer: The California experience. Sacramento: State of California Press.
9. California Healthcare Institute and KPMG. (1998). The biomedical frontier: 1998 report on California's biomedical R&D industry. La Jolla, CA: KPMG.
10. Camagni, R. (1995). The concept of innovative milieu and its relevance for public policies in European lagging regions. Papers in Regional Science: The Journal of the Regional Science Association, 74, 317-340.
11. Castells, M., & Hall, P. (1994). Technopoles of the world: The making of 21st century industrial complexes. London: Routledge.
12. Collins, O., & Moore, D. (1970). The organization makers: A behavioral study of independent entrepreneurs. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
13. Cooke, P., Uranga, M., & Etxebarria, G. (1998). Regional systems of innovation: An evolutionary perspective. Environment and Planning A, 30, 1563-1584.
14. Crabtree, P. (1998, February 17). Venture capital finds home here. San Diego Union-Tribune, pp. C1, C3.
15. Cresswell, J. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Feldman, M. P. (1994). The university and economic development: The case of Johns Hopkins University and Baltimore. Economic Development Quarterly, 8, 67-76.
17. Fried, V., & Hisrich, R. (1995). The venture capitalist: A relationship investor, California Management Review, 37, 101-113.
18. Glaeser, E. (1998). Are cities dying? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12, 139-160.
19. Glaeser, E., Kallal, H., Scheinkman, J., & Shleifer, A. (1992). Growth in cities. Journal of Political Economy, 100, 1126-1152.
20. Goetz, S., & Morgan, R. (1995). State-level locational determinants of biotechnology firms. Economic Development Quarterly, 9, 174-185.
21. Goldstein, H., & Luger, M. (1993). Theory and practice in high-tech economic development. In R. Bingham & R. Mier (Eds.), Theories of local economic development: Perspectives from the disciplines (pp.147-171). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
22. Gordon, I., & McCann, P. (2000). Industrial clusteers: Complexes, agglomeration and/or social networks? Urban Studies, 37, 513-532.
23. Grabowski, H., & Vernon, J. (1994). Innovation and structural change in pharmaceuticals and biotechnology. Industrial and Corporate Change, 4, 435-449.
24. Griliches, Z. (1992). The search for R&D spillovers. In National Bureau of Economic Research (Working Paper #3768).
25. Hall, P. (1990). The generation of innovative milieu: An essay in theoretical synthesis (Working Paper #505). Berkeley: University of California, Institute of Urban and Regional Development.
26. Hall, P., Bornstein, L., Grier, R., & Webber, M. (1988). Biotechnology: The next industrial frontier. Berkeley: University of California Press.
27. Hall, S. (1987). Invisible frontiers: The race to synthesize a human gene. London: Sidgwick & Jackson.
28. Haug, P. (1995). Formation of biotechnology firms in the Greater Seattle region: An empirical investigation of entrepreneurial, financial, and educational perspectives. Environment and Planning A, 27, 249-267.
29. Haug, P., & Ness, P. (1993). Industrial location decisions of biotechnology organizations. Economic Development Quarterly, 7, 390-402.
30. Kenney, M. (1986). Biotechnology: The university-industry complex. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
31. Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99, 483-499.
32. Llobrera, J., Meyer, D., & Nammacher, G. (1999). Trajectories of industrial districts: Impact of strategic intervention in medical districts. Economic Geography, 76(1), 68-98.
33. Malecki, E. (1985). Public sector research and development and regional economic performance in the United States. In A. Thwaites & R. Oakey (Eds.), The regional economic impact of technological change (pp. 115-131). New York: St. Martin's.
34. Malecki, E. (1991). Technology and economic development: The dynamics of local, regional, and national change. New York: Longman Scientific & Technical.
35. Malecki, E. (1997). Technology and economic development: The dynamics of local, regional, and national competitiveness. London: Addison Wesley Longman.
36. Malmberg, A. (1997). Industrial geography: Agglomeration and local milieu. Progress in Human Geography, 20, 392-403.
37. Malmberg, A., Solvell, O., & Zander, I. (1996). Spatial clustering, local accumulation of knowledge and firm competitiveness. Geografiska Annaler, 78 B, 85-97.
38. Markoff, J. (1997, March 24). San Diego-the wireless valley: An information revolution revives its economy. The New York Times, pp. C1, C6.
39. Markusen, A., Lee, Y., & DiGiovanna, S. (Eds.). (1999). Second tier cities: Rapid growth beyond the metropolis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
40. Morrison, S., & Giovannetti, G. (1999). New directions 98. Palo Alto, CA: Ernst & Young.
41. Morrison, S., & Giovannetti, G. (2000). Convergence: The biotechnology industry report. Palo Alto, CA: Ernst & Young.
42. Mowery, D., & Rosenberg, N. (1989). Technology and the pursuit of economic growth. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
43. Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (1987). Science parks and technology complexes in relation to regional development. Paris: OECD.
44. Pisano, G., Shan, W., & Teese, D. (1988). Joint ventures and collaboration in the biotechnology industry. In D. Mowery (Ed.), International collaborative ventures in U.S. manufacturing (pp. 183-222). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
45. Porter, M. 1990. The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press.
46. Powell, W., & Owen, J. (1998). Universities and the market for intellectual property in the life sciences. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 17, 253-277.
47. Prevezer, M. (1998). Clustering in biotechnology in the USA. In G. Swann, M. Prevezer, & D. Stout (Eds.), The dynamics of industrial clustering: International comparisons in computing and biotechnology (pp. 124-193). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
48. PricewaterhouseCoopers. (2001). Insights and solutions: MoneyTree survey report. Available from http://www.pwcmoneytree.com/region
49. Rosenberg, N. (1982). Inside the black box: Technology and economics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
50. Rosenberg, N., & Nelson, R. (1994). American universities and technical advance in industry. Research Policy, 23, 323-348.
51. San Diego Association of Governments. (1998, May/June). San Diego regional employment clusters: Engines of the modern economy. Info, pp. 2-31.
52. San Diego Regional Economic Development Corporation, BIOCOM, & Price Waterhouse LLP. (1998). Barometer on the future of San Diego's biomedical industry. San Diego: Regional Economic Development Corporation.
53. Saxenian, A. (1994). Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
54. Schoenberger, E. (1991). The corporate interview as a research method in economic geography. Professional Geographer, 43, 180-189.
55. Scott, A. (1990). The technopoles of Southern California. Environment and Planning A, 22, 1575-1605.
56. Scott, A., & Storper, M. (1992). Pathways to industrialization and regional development. London: Routledge.
57. Simmie, J. (1998). Reasons for the development of "Island of Innovation": Evidence from Hertfordshire. Urban Studies, 35, 1261-1289.
58. Stephan, P., Hawkins, R., & Audretsch, D. (2000). The knowledge production function: Lessons from biotechnology. International Journal of Technology Management, 19, 165-178.
59. Sternberg, R. (1996). Regional growth theories and high-tech regions. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 20, 518-538.
60. Stutz, F. (1992). Working the cities: The regional economic base. In P. Pryde (Ed.), San Diego: An introduction to the region (pp. 155-164). Dubuque, IA: Kendall.
61. U.S. Congress Office of Technology Assessment. (1995). The technological reshaping of metropolitan America, OTA-ETI-643. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
62. U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. (1994). County business patterns: California. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
63. U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. (1997). County business patterns: California. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
64. Walcott, S. (1999). High tech in the Deep South: Biomedical firm clusters in metropolitan Atlanta. Growth and Change, 30, 48-74.
65. Welles, E. (1990, February 1). The Tokyo connection. Inc. Available from http://www.inc.com/articless/details/printable/ 0.3535.CID5030_PAG2/REG6.00.html
66. Zucker, L., Darby, M., & Brewer, M. (1998). Intellectual human capital and the birth of U.S. biotechnology enterprises. American Economic Review, 88, 290-306.