Monte Carlo Simulation for the Photo-induced Low-spin to High-Spin State Transitions - Difference and Similarity with the Thermal Transition

Journal of the Physical Society of Japan

Volumn 71, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 978-988

  Sakai, Osamu ^a   Ogawa, Tetsuo ^b   Koshino, Kazuki ^c  

^a TOKYO METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c Japan Science and Technology Agency   (Japan)

Author keywords

Domain formation; Low spin high spin transition; Photo induced phase transition; Spin crossover complexes

Indexed keywords

ACCELERATION; ARTICLE; ENERGY; EXCITATION; LIGHT; MODEL; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PHASE TRANSITION; PHOTOACTIVATION; TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE; THEORY; THERMAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0036245838     PISSN: 00319015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1143/JPSJ.71.978     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. For comprehensive review see for example, P. Gütlich, A. Hauser and H. Spiering: Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 33 (1994) 2024.
2. S. Decurtins, P. Gütlich, K. M. Hasselbach, A. Hauser and H. Spiering: Inorg. Chem. 24 (1985) 2174.
3. A. Mino, Y. Ogawa, S. Koshihara, C. Urano and H. Takagi: Mol. Cryst. Liq. 314 (1998) 107.
4. Y. Ogawa, S. Koshihara, K. Koshino, T. Ogawa, C. Urano and H. Takagi: Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) 3181.
5. T. Tayagaki and K. Tanaka: Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) 2886.
6. R. Jacobi, H. Spiering and P. Gütlich: J. Phys. Chem. Solid 53 (1992) 267.
7. E. Buhks, G. Navon, M. Bixon and J. Jortner: J. Am. Chem. Soc. 102 (1980) 2918.
8. A. Hauser, A. Vef and P. Adler: J. Chem. Phys. 95 (1991) 8710.
9. See for example, T. Kambara: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 49 (1980) 1806.
10. K. Koshino and T. Ogawa: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 68 (1999) 2164.
11. K. Binder and D. Stauffer: Adv. Phys. 25 (1976) 343.
12. See for example, J. S. Langer: Solids Far From Equilibrium, ed. C. Godrèche (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992) p. 297.
13. H. Romstedt, A. Hauser and H. Spiering: J. Phys. Chem. Solids 59 (1998) 265.
14. H. Romstedt, H. Spiering and P. Gütlich: J. Phys. Chem. Solids 59 (1998) 1353.
15. B. Hoo, K. Boukheddaden and F. Varret: Eur. Phys. J. B 17 (2000) 449.
16. A. Ishikawa, T. Ogawa and V. I. Sugakov: Phys. Rev. B 64 (2001) 144301.
17. Y. Kayanuma: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 53 (1984) 108; ibid. 53 (1984) 118.
18. Y. Kayanuma: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 53 (1984) 108; ibid. 53 (1984) 118.
19. T. Kambara: J. Chem. Phys. 70 (1979) 4199.
20. N. Sasaki and T. Kambara: Phys. Rev. B 40 (1989) 2442.
21. ℓ cannot be non-uniform in space.
22. To say honestly, the changed range of excitation intensity is very small in the calculation. One will need calculations with incubation time of different order of magnitude to lead correct conclusion. To study the very long incubation time cases, calculations with very large lattice size is necessary because the critical size of droplet becomes large.
23. This will support the present MC simulation method to gain the time evolution of the master equation (2.1), which is given by primarily by the time differential form.
24. O. Sakai, T. Ogawa and K. Koshino: Phase Transitions (submitted), Proc. Int. Conf. Photoinduced Phase Transitions, their Dynamics and Precursor Phenomena, 14-16 Nov. 2001, Tsukuba, Japan.