![]() |
Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 283-289
|
Comparative evaluation of two commercial chromogenic media for detection and presumptive identification of urinary tract pathogens
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
AGAR;
CHROMOGENIC SUBSTRATE;
CYSTINE;
LACTOSE;
ANTIBIOTIC SENSITIVITY;
ARTICLE;
BACTERIAL COLONIZATION;
BACTERIAL COUNT;
BACTERIAL STRAIN;
BACTERIUM DETECTION;
BACTERIUM IDENTIFICATION;
BACTERIUM ISOLATE;
CITROBACTER;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
CORRELATION ANALYSIS;
DEVICE;
DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY;
DIFFUSION;
ENTEROBACTER;
ENTEROBACTERIACEAE;
ESCHERICHIA COLI;
HUMAN;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
KLEBSIELLA;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MORGANELLA;
NONHUMAN;
PLATING MEDIUM;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
PROTEUS;
PROVIDENCIA;
PSEUDOMONAS;
RELIABILITY;
SPECIES DIFFERENCE;
STAPHYLOCOCCUS SAPROPHYTICUS;
STREPTOCOCCUS AGALACTIAE;
URINARY TRACT INFECTION;
CANDIDA;
CHROMOGENIC COMPOUNDS;
COLONY COUNT, MICROBIAL;
CULTURE MEDIA;
DRUG RESISTANCE, BACTERIAL;
GRAM-NEGATIVE BACTERIA;
GRAM-POSITIVE BACTERIA;
HUMANS;
MICROBIAL SENSITIVITY TESTS;
URINARY TRACT INFECTIONS;
URINE;
|
EID: 0036245171
PISSN: 09349723
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1007/s10096-002-0718-0 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (27)
|
References (17)
|