Dogs, cats, raccoons, and bats: Where is the real risk for rabies?

Annals of Emergency Medicine

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 541-543

  Moran, Gregory J ^a  

^a OLIVE VIEW UCLA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BAT; BITE; CAT; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DISEASE TRANSMISSION; DOG; EDITORIAL; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RABIES; RACCOON; RISK ASSESSMENT; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0036239291     PISSN: 01960644     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mem.2002.122708     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Cryptogenic rabies, bats, and the question of aerosol transmission
2. Incidence of dog bite injuries treated in emergency departments
3. A review of the economics of the prevention and control of rabies. Part I. Global impact and rabies in humans
4. Rabies surveillance in the United States during 1999
5. Appropriateness of rabies postexposure prophylaxis treatment for animal exposures
6. Causes, costs, and estimates of rabies postexposure prophylaxis treatments in the United States
7. The epidemiology of human rabies postexposure prophylaxis, 1980-1981
8. Rabies postexposure prophylaxis survey - Kentucky, 1994
9. Postexposure rabies prophylaxis in an urban emergency department
10. Human rabies prevention - United States, 1999. Recommendations of the advisory committee on immunization practices (ACIP)
11. Occult exposure to bats in Oregon: Implications for rabies post-exposure prophylaxis