Epilepsy, automatism and culpable driving

Medicine and Law

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 133-153

  McSherry, Bernadette ^a  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATISM; CAR DRIVING; CIVIL DEFENSE; COGNITIVE DEFECT; COURT; CRIME; CRIMINAL LAW; EPILEPSY; EXPERT WITNESS; HUMAN; LAW SUIT; NEGLIGENCE; REVIEW; TRAFFIC ACCIDENT; UNCONSCIOUSNESS;

EID: 0036230777     PISSN: 07231393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Automatisms - The current legal position related to clinical practice and medicolegal interpretation
2. Automatisms: The gulf between medicine and the law
3. M'Naghten rules epilepsy - OK?
4. R v Sullivan: Epilepsy, insanity and the common law
5. Epilepsy, insanity and automatism
6. Epilepsy and insanity under the M'Naghten Rules
7. Some notes on non-insane automatism and the will
8. Involuntary acts and the actus reus
9. Voluntariness, automatism and insanity: Reflections on Falconer
10. Epilepsy and automatism
11. Brain, mind and behaviour: Some medico-legal aspects
12. Epileptic action and criminal responsibility
13. Involuntary conduct and the case of the unconscious driver: Reflections on Jiminez
14. Involuntary conduct and the criminal law: The case of the unconscious driver
15. Automatism in Australia since Falconer's case
16. Defining what is a "Disease of the Mind": The untenability of current legal interpretations
17. Epilepsy and the criminal law
18. Epilepsy and criminal law: A supplementary comment
19. Stretching out the Actus Reus