Evaluation of a new formulation CLOtest

Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Australia)

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 127-130

  Viiala, Charlie H ^a   Windsor, Helen M ^b   Forbes, Geoff M ^c   Chairman, Simon O ^b   Marshall, Barry J ^a,b,e   Mollison, Lindsay C ^d  

^a SIR CHARLES GAIRDNER HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^c ROYAL PERTH HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^d Bethesda Hospital   (United States)

^e PATHWEST LABORATORY MEDICINE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Helicobacter pylori; Urease

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BACTERIUM DETECTION; COLOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HELICOBACTER INFECTION; HELICOBACTER PYLORI; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STOMACH BIOPSY; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 0036228216     PISSN: 08159319     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1746.2002.02563.x     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Rapid urease test in the management of Campylobacter pyloridis - Associated gastritis
2. The influence of warming on rapid urease test results: A prospective evaluation
3. Evaluation of a new urease reagent strip for detection of Helicobacter pylori in gastric biopsy specimens
4. Prospective evaluation of a new urea-membrane test for the detection of Helicobacter pylori in gastric antral tissue
5. Prospective comparison of commercially available rapid urease tests for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori
6. Comparison of agar gel (CLOtest) or reagent strip (PyloriTek) rapid urease tests for detection of Helicobacter pylori infection
7. The PyloriTek test and the CLOtest: Accuracy and incremental cost analysis