Making practice decisions: Is what's good for the goose good for the gander?

Ethical Human Sciences and Services

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 31-46

  Gambrill, Eileen ^a   Gibbs, Leonard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL ETHICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SOCIAL WORK; SOCIAL WORKER;

EID: 0036226052     PISSN: 1523150X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: Explanation and elaboration
2. What is pseudoscience?
3. Who (or what) can do psychotherapy: The status and challenge of nonprofessional therapies
4. The Campbell Collaboration: Does for public policy what Cochrane does for health
5. Changing physician performance: A systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies
6. Statistical prediction versus clinical prediction: Improving what works
7. Social work and science: Many ways of knowing?
8. Evidence-based practice: An alternative to authority-based practice
9. Social work and philosophy
10. Programs of assertive community treatment (PACT): A critical review
11. Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures
12. A history of facilitated communication: Science, pseudoscience and antiscience working group on facilitated communication
13. The scientifically illiterate
14. Grey zones of clinical practice: Some limits of evidence-based medicine
15. The science of reviewing research
16. Knowledge use in direct practice
17. Rationales for practice decisions: Variations in knowledge use by decision task and social work service
18. Introducing critical appraisal skills training in the U.K. social services: Another link between health and social care?
19. Recovered memory therapy: A dubious practice technique