Amphibian translocation programs: Reply to Seigel and Dodd

Conservation Biology

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 555-556

  Trenham, Peter C ^a   Marsh, David M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON AND LEE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMPHIBIA;

EID: 0036225554     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01462.x     Document Type: Note

References (16)

1. Disease risks of wildlife translocations
2. The DAPTF fieldwork code of practice
3. A recovery program for the natterjack toad (Bufo calamita) in Britain
4. Relocation, repatriation, and translocation of amphibians and reptiles: Are they conservation strategies that work?
5. Tropical larval anuran fitness in the absence of direct effects of predation and competition
6. Translocation as a species conservation tool: Status and strategy
7. Resistance and resilience of alpine lake fauna to fish introductions
8. Metapopulation dynamics and amphibian conservation
9. Wetland mitigation and amphibians: Preliminary observations at a southwestern Illinois bottomland hardwood forest restoration site
10. Creating and restoring wetlands
11. Experimental repatriation of boreal toad (Bufo boreas) eggs, metamorphs, and adults in Rocky Mountain National Park
12. Translocation of amphibians: Proven management method or experimental technique?
13. Movement corridors: Conservation bargains or poor investments
14. Gene flow and endangered species translocations: A topic revisited
15. Experimental ecology of food webs: Complex systems in temporary ponds
16. Reintroduction of the European tree frog (Hyla arborea) in Latvia