Editorial: Ureteral stenting - An obsolete procedure?

Journal of Urology

Volumn 167, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 1984-

  Moon, Timothy D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; EDITORIAL; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LITHOTRIPSY; NEPHROLITHIASIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TREATMENT INDICATION; URETER STENT; URETER STONE; URETEROSCOPY; UROLOGY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; LASER LITHOTRIPSY; NOTE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STENT; URETER OBSTRUCTION;

HUMANS; LITHOTRIPSY, LASER; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS; STENTS; URETERAL CALCULI; URETERAL OBSTRUCTION; URETEROSCOPY;

EID: 0036223546     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65068-9     Document Type: Editorial

References (5)

1. Editorial: Ureteroscopy - Current and future (?) practice
2. Is stenting following ureteroscopy for removal of distal ureteral calculi necessary?
3. A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing nonstented versus stented ureteroscopic lithotripsy
4. Ureteral stenting after ureteroscopy for distal ureteral calculi: A multi-institutional prospective randomized controlled study assessing pain, outcomes and complications
5. To stent or not to stent? That is still the question