Effects of treatment history and centralized intake on drug treatment outcomes

Journal of Psychoactive Drugs

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 87-95

  Sears, Clare ^a   Davis, Thomas ^a   Guydish, Joseph ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Centralized intake; Substance abuse treatment; Treatment history; Treatment outcomes

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL; AMPHETAMINE; CANNABIS; COCAINE; DIAMORPHINE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HISTORY; HUMAN; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; SOCIAL PROBLEM; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; THERAPY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0036214284     PISSN: 02791072     EISSN: 21599777     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02791072.2002.10399940     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Anglin, M.D.; Hser, Y.I. & Grella, C. 1991. Drug addiction and treatment careers among clients in the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). Psychology of Addictive Behaviors II (4): 308-23.
2. Beck, A. 1912. Depression: Causes and Treatment. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.
3. Becnel, J.M.; Ray, S.; Wolf, T.M.; Detiege, J.J.; Dollar, S. & Gable Jr., W. 1999. Target Cities as an effective solution to the special problems of treatment and recovery in the city ofLaisser Le Bon Temps Roulle. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 31(3): 225-31.
4. Bluthenthal, R.; Gee, L.; Gleghorn, A.; Iguchi, M. & Eldin, B. 2000. Factors associated with treatment entry under conditions of “treatment on demand”: I year follow-up data. Paper presented at the Sixty-Second College on Problems of Drug Dependence. San Juan, Puerto Rico, June 11-22.
5. Center for Substance AbuseTreatment. 1995. The Target Cities Program: Partnerships to Increase Availability of and Access to Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment. Rockville, Maryland: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
6. Claus, R.E.; Mannen, R.K. & Schicht, W.W. 1999. Treatment career snapshots: Profiles of first treatment and previous treatment clients. Addictive Behaviors 24 (4): 411-19.
7. Cohen, S.; Mermelstein, R.; Kamarck, T. & Haberman, H. 1985. Measuring the functional components ofsocial support. In: I. Sarason & B. Sarason (Eds.) Social Support: Theory, Research, and Applications. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
8. Derogatis, L.R. & Melisaratos, N. 1983. The Brief Symptom Inventory: An introductory report. Psychological Medicine 13 (3): 595-605.
9. Finney, J.W. & Moos, R.H. 1986. Matching patients with treatments: Conceptual and methodological issues. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 47 (2): 122-34.
10. Grella, C.E. & Joshi, V. 1999. Gender differences in drug treatment careers among clients in the national Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 25 (3): 385-406.
11. Guydish, J.; Stephens, R. & Muck, R. In press. Lessons learned from the national Target Cities initiative to improve publicly funded substance abuse treatment systems. In: R.C. Stephens; C. Scott & R.D. Muck (Eds.) Central Evaluation and Referral for Alcohol and Drug Clients: The Target Cities Experience. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.
12. Guydish, J.; Foss, M.; Barron, N.; Klingemann, S.; Scott, C. & Bostrom, A. In press a. Does centralized intake improve substance abuse outcomes: A multisite analysis. In: R.C. Stephens; C. Scott & R.D. Muck (Eds.) Central Evaluation and Referral for Alcohol and Drug Clients: The Target Cities Experience. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.
13. Guydish, J.; Ponath, C.; Bostrom, A.; Campbell, K. & Barron, N. In press b. Effects of losing SSI benefits on standard drug and alcohol outcome measures. Contemporary Drug Problems.
14. Guydish, J.; Woods, W.J.; Davis, T.; Bostrom, A. & Frazier, Y. 2001. Does centralized intake improve drug abuse treatment outcomes? Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 20: 1-9.
15. Guydish, J.; Moore, L. Gleghorn, A.; Davis, T.; Sears, C. & Harcourt, J. 2000. Drug abuse treatment on demand in San Francisco: Preliminary findings. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 32 (4): 36370.
16. Guydish, J.; Werdegar, D.; Sorensen, J.L.; Clark, W. & Acampora, A. 1998. Drug abuse day treatment: A randomized client trial comparing day and residential treatment programs. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 66 (2): 280-89.
17. Havassy, B.E.; Hall, S.M & Wasserman, D.A. 1991. Social support and relapse: Commonalties among alcoholics, opiate users, andcigarette smokers. Addictive Behaviors 16 (5): 235-46.
18. Hser, Y.I.; Grella, C.E.; Hsieh, S.C.; Anglin, M.D. & Brown, B.S. 1999a. Prior treatment experience related to process and outcomes in DATOS. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 57 (2): 137-50.
19. Hser, Y.l.; Joshi, V.; Anglin, M.D. & Fletcher, B. 1999b. Predicting posttreatment cocaine abstinence for first-time admissions and treatment repeaters. American Jouirnal of Public Health 89 (5): 66671.
20. Hser, Y.l.; Polinsky, M.L.; Maglione, M. & Anglin, M.D. 1999c. Matching clients' needs with drug treatment services. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 16 (4): 299-305.
21. Hser, Y.l.; Maglione, M.; Polinsky, M.L. & Anglin, M.D. 1998. Predicting drug treatment entry among treatment-seeking individuals. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 15 (3): 213-20.
22. Hser, Y.l.; Anglin, M.D.; Grella, C.; Longshore, D. & Prendergast, M.L. 1997. Drug treatment careers: A conceptual framework andexisting research findings. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 14 (6): 543-58.
23. Hubbard, R.; Marsden, M.; Rachal, J.; Harwood, H.; Cavanaugh, E. & Ginsburg, H. 1989. Drug Abuse Treatment: A National Study of Effectiveness. Chapel Hill, North Carolina: University of North Carolina Press.
24. Institute of Medicine 1990. Broadening the Base of Treatment for Alcohol Problems. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
25. Littell, R.; Milliken, G.; Stroup, W. & Wolfinger, R. 1996. SAS Systems for Mixed Models. Cary, South Carolina: SAS Institute.
26. Manski, C. F.; Pepper, J. & Petrie, C. 2001. Informing America's Policy on Illegal Drugs: What We Don't Know Keeps Hurting Us. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
27. Marlatt, G. 1988. Matching clients to treatment: Treatment models and stages of change. In: D. Donovan & G. Marlatt (Eds.) Assessment of Addictive Behaviors: The Guilford Behavioral Assessment Series. New York: Guilford Press.
28. Mattick, R.P. & Hall, W. 1996. Are detoxification programmes effective? Lancet 347 (8994): 97-100.
29. McLellan, A.T. & Alterman, A. 1991. Patient treatment matching: A conceptual and methodological review with suggestions for future research: In: R. Pickens; C. Leukefeld & C. Schuster (Eds.) Improving Drug Abuse Treatment. NIDA Research Monograph No. 106. Rockville, Maryland: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
30. McLellan, A.T.; Luborsky, L.; Woody, G.E. & O'Brien, C.P. 1980. An improved diagnostic evaluation instrument for substance abuse patients: The Addiction Severity Index. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 168 (1): 26-33.
31. Miller, W.R. & Hester, R.K. 1986. Inpatient alcoholism treatment. Who benefits? American Psychologist 41 (7): 794-805.
32. Moos, R.H. & King, M.J. 1997. Participation in community residential treatment and substance abuse patients' outcomes at discharge. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 14 (I): 71-80.
33. Ouimette, P.C.; Ahrens, C.; Moos, R.H. & Finney, J.W. 1998. During treatment changes in substance abuse patients with posttraumatic stress disorder. The influence of specific interventions and program environments. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 15 (6): 55564.
34. Project Match Research Group. 1997. Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity: Project MATCH posttreatment drinking outcomes. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 58 (I): 7-29.
35. Rohrer, J.E.; Vaughan, M.S.; Cadoret, R.J.; Carswell, C.; Patterson, A. & Zwick, J. 1996. Effect of centralized intake on outcomes of substance abuse treatment. Psychiatric Services 47 (11): 1233-8.
36. SchUtz, C.G.; Rapiti, E.; Vlahov, D. & Anthony, J.C. 1994. Suspected determinants of enrollment into detoxification and methadone maintenance treatment among injecting drug users. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 36 (2): 129-38.
37. Scott, C. & Muck, R. In press. Background and overview of the Target Cities Demonstration Project. In: R.C. Stephens; C. Scott & R.D. Muck (Eds.) Central Evaluation and Referral for Alcohol and Drug Clients: The Target Cities Experience. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.
38. Simpson, D.D.; Joe, G.W. & Brown, B.S. 1997. Treatment retention and follow-up outcomes in the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 11 (4): 294-307.
39. Simpson, D.D.; Joe, G.W.; Greener, J.M. & Rowan-Szal, GA. 2000. Modeling year I outcomes with treatment process and posttreatment social influences. Substance Use and Misuse 35 (12-14): 1911-30.
40. Simpson, D.D.; Joe, G.W.; Rowan-Szal, G.A. & Greener, J.M. 1997. Drug abuse treatment process components that improve retention. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 14 (6): 565-72.
41. Simpson, D.D.; Joe, G.W.; Rowan-Szal, G.A. & Greener, J. 1995. Client engagement and change during drug abuse treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse 7 (1): 117-34.
42. Simpson, D.D. & Sells, S B. 1990. Opioid Addiction and Treatment: A 12-year Follow-up. Malabar, Florida: Robert E. Krieger Publishing Company.
43. Stephens, R. & Favinger, J. 1997. Mini-Study 2: CIU versus non-CIU analysis. Unpublished report.
44. Wickizer, T.; Maynard, C.; Atherly, A.; Frederick, M.; Koepsell, T.; Krupski, A. & Stark, K. 1994. Completion rates of clients discharged from drug and alcohol treatment programs in Washington state. American Journal of Public Health 84 (2): 215-21.