Death - Whose decision? Physician-assisted dying and the terminally ill

Western Journal of Medicine

Volumn 176, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 120-123

  Fraser, Sharon I ^a   Walters, James W ^a  

^a LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUSTRALIA; DEATH; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; DYING; EUTHANASIA; FAMILY; HUMAN; JUSTICE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT; PHYSICIAN; SHORT SURVEY; TERMINAL DISEASE; UNITED STATES;

DEATH AND EUTHANASIA; LEGAL APPROACH;

ETHICS, MEDICAL; HUMANS; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; SUICIDE, ASSISTED; TERMINALLY ILL;

EID: 0036209483     PISSN: 00930415     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Short Survey

References (17)

1. Why I need to die
2. High Court refuses to grant constitutional "right to die"
3. Voters in Oregon soundly endorse assisted suicide
4. Oregon's Death With Dignity Act: Fourteen months and counting
5. How euthanasia law was sunk
6. Oregon Death With Dignity Law
7. Reactions to Australian state's euthanasia law
8. A question of human rights
9. Assisted-suicide debate splits Catholics
10. Doctors must explain: Opposition to Measure 16
11. Euthanasia: Attitudes and practices of medical practitioners
12. Professed religious affiliation and the practice of euthanasia
13. Attitudes of Michigan physicians and the public toward legalizing physician-assisted suicide and voluntary euthanasia
14. Double effect
15. Others will follow
16. Wife's pain drives leader of right-to-die ballot issue