Do pixel-level analyses describe psychological perceptual similarity? A comment on 'category-specific naming and the 'visual' characteristics of line drawn stimuli' by Laws and Gale

Cortex

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 3-5

  Humphreys, Glyn W ^a   Riddoch, M Jane ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL ERROR; BODY REGIONS; CLASSIFICATION; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DRAWING; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; INSTRUMENT; MENTAL PATIENT; MUSIC; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; NONHUMAN; NOTE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM;

EID: 0036201527     PISSN: 00109452     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70634-8     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. A spurious category-specific visual agnosia for living things in normal human and non human primates
2. Visual crowding and category specific deficits for pictorial stimuli. A neural network model
3. Hierarchies, similarity and interactivity in object recognition. On the multiplicity of 'category specific' deficits in neuropsychological populations
4. Semantic interference on naming using a post-cue procedure: Tapping the links between semantics and phonology with pictures and words
5. Cascade processes in picture identification
6. Exemplar models and category-specific deficits
7. Category specific naming and the 'visual' characteristics of line drawn stimuli
8. A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity and visual complexity
9. Explaining category-related effects in the retrieval of conceptual and lexical knowledge for concrete entities: Operationalization and analysis of factors