|
Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 667-670
|
Cost comparison of endoscopic stenting vs surgical treatment for unresectable cholangiocarcinoma
a a a a a a |
Author keywords
Cholangiocarcinoma; Cost comparison; Endoscopic stenting
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
AGED;
ARTICLE;
BILE DUCT BYPASS;
BILE DUCT CARCINOMA;
CLINICAL ARTICLE;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS;
ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY;
ENDOSCOPIC THERAPY;
FEMALE;
HOSPITAL COST;
HUMAN;
LIFESPAN;
MALE;
OBSTRUCTIVE JAUNDICE;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;
STENT;
SURGICAL APPROACH;
SURVIVAL;
TUMOR BIOPSY;
BILE LEAKAGE;
BILIARY STENT;
BILIARY TRACT BIOPSY;
BILIARY TRACT SURGERY;
CANCER STAGING;
CHOLANGITIS;
CHOLEDOCHOJEJUNOSTOMY;
DUODENOSCOPE;
ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY;
GROUPS BY AGE;
HEALTH CARE COST;
HEPATOJEJUNOSTOMY;
HOSPITAL CHARGE;
IN-STENT RESTENOSIS;
LIVER RESECTION;
OUTCOME ASSESSMENT;
PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY;
REPEAT PROCEDURE;
SELF EXPANDABLE METALLIC STENT;
SEX DIFFERENCE;
SILICONE PROSTHESIS;
AGED;
ANASTOMOSIS, ROUX-EN-Y;
BILE DUCT NEOPLASMS;
BILE DUCTS, INTRAHEPATIC;
CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA;
CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE;
CHOLESTASIS;
COMMON BILE DUCT;
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
FEMALE;
HEPATECTOMY;
HUMANS;
MALE;
PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY;
POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS;
RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
STENTS;
TREATMENT FAILURE;
|
EID: 0036199789
PISSN: 09302794
EISSN: 14322218
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1007/s004640080006 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (38)
|
References (17)
|