메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 131-140

Evaluating public commentary and scientific evidence submitted in the development of a risk assessment

Author keywords

Health policy; Risk assessment; Science evaluation; Tobacco smoke pollution

Indexed keywords

CARCINOGENS; PUBLIC POLICY; SMOKE; TOBACCO;

EID: 0036193388     PISSN: 02724332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/0272-4332.t01-1-00011     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (16)

References (37)
  • 7
    • 85021296724 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • "Flue-Cured Tobacco Co-op v. U.S.E.P.A.," 4 F.Supp.2d 435 (M.D.N.C. 1998)
  • 14
    • 0032480603 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The present state of medical journals
    • (1998) Lancet , vol.72 , Issue.1 , pp. SII18-SII22
    • Rennie, D.1
  • 15
    • 0030689777 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Citations and journal impact factors: Questionable indicators of research quality
    • (1997) Allergy , vol.52 , Issue.11 , pp. 1050-1056
    • Seglen, P.O.1
  • 20
    • 0015493305 scopus 로고
    • Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation
    • (1972) Science , vol.178 , Issue.60 , pp. 471-479
    • Garfield, E.1
  • 22
    • 0029783235 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How can impact factors be improved?
    • (1996) BMJ , vol.313 , Issue.7054 , pp. 411-413
    • Garfield, E.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.