Comparison of three methods of oral reconstruction for quality-of-life assessment [4]

Annals of Plastic Surgery

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 334-335

  Knezevic, Predrag ^a   Uglesic, Vedran ^a   Virag, Miso ^a   Varga, Sinisa ^a  

^a University of Zagreb School of Medicine   (Croatia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER STAGING; CONTROLLED STUDY; ESTHETIC SURGERY; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; LETTER; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MICROVASCULATURE; MOUTH CANCER; MOUTH CAVITY; ORAL SURGERY; PECTORALIS MAJOR MUSCLE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; SPEECH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TISSUE FLAP; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0036193346     PISSN: 01487043     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00000637-200203000-00023     Document Type: Letter

References (7)

1. A systematic approach to functional reconstruction of the oral cavity following partial and total glossectomy
2. A comparison of resource costs for head and neck reconstruction with microvascular and pectoralis major flaps
3. A re-evaluation of hypopharyngeal reconstruction: Pedicled flaps versus microvascular free flaps
4. Cervical skin flaps for intraoral and pharyngeal repair following cancer surgery
5. Functional reconstruction of the tongue and deglutition muscles following extensive resection of tongue cancer
6. Predictive factors for functional recovery after free tissue transfer oromandibular reconstruction
7. Is the pectoralis myocutaneous flap in intraoral and oropharyngeal reconstruction outdated?