Is peritoneal closure necessary in obstetrical and gynaecological surgery?

Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Volumn 81, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 78-79

  Bhide, Amarnath ^a  

^a NONE   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADHESION; ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL GRAFT; CESAREAN SECTION; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; HEMOPERITONEUM; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; ISCHEMIA; NONHUMAN; OBSTETRIC OPERATION; PERITONEUM; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SUTURE; WOUND CLOSURE; WOUND HEALING;

CESAREAN SECTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY; PERITONEUM; PREGNANCY;

EID: 0036188978     PISSN: 00016349     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2002.810114.x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Incisions in gynaecologic surgery
2. Hysterectomy
3. Hysterectomy
4. Is peritoneal closure necessary?
5. The etiology of post-operative abdominal adhesions, an experimental study
6. Peritoneal non-closure at Caesarean section
7. Peritoneal closure or non-closure at Caesarean section
8. A randomised study of closure of peritoneum at Caesarean delivery
9. Planned Caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth at term: A randomised multicenter trial
10. Peritoneal closure at vaginal hysterectomy: A reassessment
11. Closure of laparotomy incisions with or without peritoneal suturing and second look laparoscopy
12. Evaluation of peritoneal closure at laparotomy
13. Small bowel obstruction in a peritoneal defect after laparoscopic Burch procedure
14. Non-closure of peritoneum at surgery