Dynamic transperineal ultrasound in the diagnosis of pelvic floor disorders: Pilot study

Diseases of the Colon and Rectum

Volumn 45, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 239-248

  Beer Gabel, Marc ^a   Teshler, Mark ^a   Barzilai, Naphtali ^a   Lurie, Yoav ^a   Malnick, Stephen ^a   Bass, David ^a   Zbar, Andrew ^a  

^a KAPLAN MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

Author keywords

Defecography; Pelvic floor; Perineal ultrasound; Rectocelel

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANUS SPHINCTER; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; CYSTOCELE; DEFECOGRAPHY; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PELVIC DISEASE; PELVIS FLOOR; PELVIS FLOOR DISORDER; RECTOCELE; RECTUM PROLAPSE;

EID: 0036167503     PISSN: 00123706     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10350-004-6155-7     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. 1 DD Maglinte FM Kelvin K Fitzgerald DS Hale T Benson 1999 Association of compartment defects in pelvic floor dysfunction AJR Am J Roentgenol 172 439 444
2. 2 AC Weidner VH Low 1998 Imaging studies of the pelvic floor Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 4 825 848
3. 3 JC Healy S Halligan RH Reznek 1997 Dynamic MR imaging compared with evacuation proctography when evaluating anorectal configuration and pelvic floor movement Br J Surg 11 1555 1558 et al.. ;: –.-->
4. 4 A Lienemann C Anthuber A Baron P Kohz M Reiser 1997 Dynamic MR colpocystorectography assessing pelvic-floor descent Eur Radiol 7 1309 1317
5. 5 R Goei G Kemerink 1990 Radiation dose in defecography Radiology 176 137 139
6. 6 JR Fielding DJ Griffiths E Versi RV Mulken ML Lee FA Jolesz 1998 MR imaging of pelvic floor continence mechanisms in the supine and sitting positions AJR Am J Roentgenol 171 1607 1610
7. 7 H Kleinübing Jr JF Jannini O Malafaia S Brenner M Pinho 2000 Transperineal ultrasonography Dis Colon Rectum 43 1572 1574
8. 8 JC Healy S Halligan RH Reznek S Watson RK Phillips P Armstrong 1997 Patterns of prolapse in women and symptoms of pelvic floor weakness Radiology 203 77 81
9. 9 GN Schaer OR Koechli B Schuessler U Haller 1995 Perineal ultrasound for evaluating the bladder neck in urinary stress incontinence Obstet Gynecol 85 220 224
10. 10 TH Green 1975 Urinary stress incontinence Am J Obstet Gynecol 122 368 400
11. 11 P Mahieu J Pringot P Bodart 1984 Defecography. 1. Description of a new procedure and results in normal patients Gastrointest Radiol 9 247 251
12. 12 PJ Shorvon S McHugh NE Diamant S Somers GW Stevenson 1989 Defecography in normal volunteers Gut 30 1737 1749
13. 13 K Kenton S Shott L Brubaker 1999 The anatomic and functional variability in rectocele in women Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 10 96 99
14. 14 DJ Rubens JG Strang S Bogineni-Misra IE Wexler 1998 Transperineal sonography of the rectum AJR Am J Roentgenol 170 637 642
15. 15 UM Peschers JO DeLancey GN Schaer B Schuessler 1997 Exoanal ultrasound of the anal sphincter Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104 999 1003
16. 16 H Koebl G Bernascheck J Deutinger 1990 Assessment of female urinary incontinence by introital sonography J Clin Ultrasound 18 370 374
17. 17 MJ Quinn J Beynon NJ Mortensen PJ Smith 1988 Transvaginal endosonography Br J Urol 62 414 418
18. 18 AC Poen RJ Felt-Bersma MA Cuesta GM Meuwissen 1998 Vaginal endosonography of the anal sphincter complex is important in the assessment of faecal incontinence and perianal sepsis Br J Surg 85 359 363
19. 19 JS Pittman JT Benson JE Sumners 1990 Physiologic evaluation of the anorectum Dis Colon Rectum 33 476 478
20. 20 RJ Felt-Bersma WJ Luth JJ Janssen SG Meuwissen 1990 Defecography in patients with anorectal disorders Dis Colon Rectum 33 277 284
21. 21 HP Dietz PD Wilson 1999 The influence of bladder volume on the position and mobility of the urethrovesical junction Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 10 3 6
22. 22 A Lienemann C Anthuber A Baron M Reiser 2000 Diagnosing enteroceles using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging Dis Colon Rectum 43 205 213
23. 23 AW Schoenberger JF Debatin I Guldenschuh 1998 Dynamic MR defecography with a superconducting, open-configuration MR system Radiology 206 641 646 et al.. ;: –.-->