|
Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 27-35
|
Can guidelines impact the ordering of magnetic resonance imaging studies by primary care providers for low back pain?
a a a a a |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
ARTICLE;
COHORT ANALYSIS;
CONSULTATION;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DEMOGRAPHY;
FEMALE;
HEALTH CARE POLICY;
HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION;
HUMAN;
LOW BACK PAIN;
LUMBAR SPINE;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MALE;
MEDICAL AUDIT;
MEDICAL EDUCATION;
NEUROSURGERY;
NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
PATIENT REFERRAL;
PRACTICE GUIDELINE;
PREDICTION;
PREFERRED PROVIDER ORGANIZATION;
PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;
SURGEON;
SYMPTOM;
AGED;
COHORT STUDIES;
FEMALE;
GUIDELINE ADHERENCE;
HOSPITALS, TEACHING;
HOSPITALS, VETERANS;
HUMANS;
INDIANA;
LOW BACK PAIN;
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
NEUROSURGERY;
ORTHOPEDICS;
PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS;
PRACTICE GUIDELINES;
PRIMARY HEALTH CARE;
REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION;
UNITED STATES;
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS;
|
EID: 0036165936
PISSN: 10880224
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (37)
|
References (27)
|