How relevant are the systematic reviews in the cochrane library to emergency medical practice?

Annals of Emergency Medicine

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 153-158

  Emond, Stephen D ^a,b   Wyer, Peter C ^a,c   Brown, Michael D ^d   Cordell, William H ^e   Spooner, Carol H ^f   Rowe, Brian H ^f  

^a NEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^c College of Physicians and Surgeons ^*  (United States)

^d MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILDBIRTH; COCHRANE LIBRARY; EMERGENCY MEDICINE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; INJURY; MEDICAL PRACTICE; META ANALYSIS; PATIENT CARE; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPIRATORY TRACT DISEASE; RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTION; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STATISTICS; STROKE;

EID: 0036161332     PISSN: 01960644     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mem.2002.120795     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. The Cochrane Library: A resource for clinical problem solving in emergency medicine
2. Ten challenges at the intersection of clinical research, evidence-based medicine, and pain relief
3. Grey zones of clinical practice: Some limits to evidence-based medicine
4. Evidence produced in evidence-based medicine needs to be relevant
5. Use of the Cochrane Library by emergency physicians
6. Evidence-based medicine and anaesthesia: Uneasy bedfellows?
7. The unpredictability paradox: Review of empirical comparisons of randomised and non-randomised clinical trials
8. General practitioner's perceptions of the route to evidence based medicine: A questionnaire survey
9. Meeting the information needs of clinicians for the practice of evidence-based healthcare
10. The model of the clinical practice of emergency medicine