Effects of baseline risk information on social and individual choices

Medical Decision Making

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 71-75

  Gyrd Hansen, Dorte ^a   Kristiansen, Ivar Sønbø ^a   Nexøe, Jørgen ^a   Nielsen, Jesper Bo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Economic evaluation; Preferences; Risk perception; Shared decision making; Willingness to pay

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DATA ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH SERVICE; HIGH RISK PATIENT; INDIVIDUALIZATION; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOCIAL ASPECT; SOCIOECONOMICS;

EID: 0036150683     PISSN: 0272989X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X0202200107     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Risk communication: Absolute versus relative expressions of low-probability risk
2. Evaluation of life and limb: A theoretical approach
3. The value of changes in the probability of death or injury
4. Valuing mortality risk: Theory and practice
5. The marginal value of job safety: A vontingent valuation study
6. An empirical analysis of the economic value of risk change
7. Analysing public preferences for cancer screening programmes
8. Mental accounting and changes in price: The frame dependence of reference dependence
9. So people actually pursue risk elimination in environmental risk management?
10. Insensitivity to the value of human life: A study of psychophysical numbing
11. Psychophysical numbing: When lives are valued less as the lives at risk increase
12. Confusion of relative and absolute risk in valuation
13. The framing of decisions and psychology of choice
14. Blind justice: Fairness to groups and the do-no-harm principle
15. Framing effects in the evaluation of multiple risk reduction
16. The conflict between notions of fairness and the Pareto principle
17. The trade-off between severity of illness and treatment effect in cost-value analysis of health care
18. Maximising health benefits vs. egalitarianism - An Australian survey of health issues
19. What does the public think about rationing? A review of the evidence
20. How stable are people's preferences for giving priority to severely ill patients?
21. Capabilities and utilities