Comparison of 3 bone substitutes in canine extraction sites

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Volumn 60, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 53-58

  Indovina, Anthony ^a   Block, Michael S ^a  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BONE PROSTHESIS; CANINE TOOTH; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOG; FEMALE; HEALING; HISTOLOGY; NONHUMAN; OSSIFICATION; OSTEOLYSIS; PREMOLAR TOOTH; TOOTH EXTRACTION;

EID: 0036142656     PISSN: 02782391     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/joms.2002.00001     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Bone healing following use of hydroxylapatite or ionomeric bone substitutes alone or combined with a guide bone regeneration technique: An animal study
2. Indication for hydroxylapatite cement reconstruction in lateral based skull surgery
3. Hydroxylapatite cement: A new method for achieving watertight closure in transtemporal surgery
4. Failure of hydroxylapatite cement to set in repair of a cranial defect: Case report
5. Preserving alveolar ridge anatomy following tooth removal in conjunction with delayed implant placement
6. A comparison of dense and particulate forms of hydroxylapatite in dog extraction sites
7. Hydroxylapatite cement implants for regeneration of periodontal osseous defects in humans
8. Healing around implants placed in bone defects treated with Bio-Oss: An experimental study in the dog