Trait ratings for automated essay grading

Educational and Psychological Measurement

Volumn 62, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 5-18

  Shermis, Mark D ^a   Koch, Chantal Mees ^b   Page, Ellis B ^c   Keith, Timothy Z ^d   Harrington, Susanmarie ^b  

^a FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036108979     PISSN: 00131644     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0013164402062001001     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Arbuckle, J. L., & Wothke, W. (1999). Amos 4.0 user's guide. Chicago: SmallWaters.
2. Bennett, R. E., &Bejar, I. I. (1998). Validity and automated scoring: It's not only the scoring. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 17(4), 9-17.
3. Burstein, J., Braden-Harder, L., Chodorow, M., Hua, S., Kaplan, B., Kukich, K., et al. (1998). Computer analysis of essay content for automated score prediction: A prototype automated scoring system for GMAT analytical writing assessment essays (RR-98-15). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
4. Hamp-Lyons, L. (1995). Rating nonnative writing: The trouble with holistic scoring. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 759-762.
5. Harrington, S., Shermis, M. D., &Rollins, A. (2000). The influence of processing on English placement test results. Computers and Composition, 17, 197-210.
6. Keith, T. Z. (1998, April). Construct validity of PEG. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
7. Landauer, T., Laham, D., &Foltz, P. (1998, April). The Goldilocks principle for vocabulary acquisition and learning: Latent semantic analysis theory and applications. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
8. McCollum, K. (1999, January 29). Computers will help grade essays on Graduate Management Admission Test. Chronicle of Higher Education, 44, p. A30.
9. Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13-104). New York: Macmillan.
10. Mzumara, H. R., Shermis, M. D., &Fogel, M. (1998). Validity of the IUPUI placement test scores for course placement: 1997-1998. Indianapolis: Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis Testing Center.
11. Page, E. B. (1994). Computer grading of student prose, using modern concepts and software. Journal of Experimental Education, 62, 127-142.
12. Page, E. B., Lavoie, M. J., &Keith, T. Z. (1996, April). Computer grading of essay traits in student writing. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, New York.
13. Page, E. B., &Petersen, N. S. (1995). The computer moves into essay grading: Updating the ancient test. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 561-565.
14. Page, E. B., Poggio, J. P., &Keith, T. Z. (1997, March). Computer analysis of student essays: Finding trait differences in the student profile. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
15. Perkins, K. (1983). On the use of composition scoring techniques, objective measures, and objective tests to evaluate ESL writing ability. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 651-671.
16. Petersen, N. S., &Page, E. B. (1997, March). New developments in Project Essay Grade: Second ETS blind test with GRE essays. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
17. Roid, G. H. (1994). Patterns of writing skills derived from cluster analysis of direct-writing assessments. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 159-170.
18. Shermis, M. D. (1997, March). Recent developments in college placement testing: Assessments via the World Wide Web. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
19. Shermis, M. D., Mzumara, H. R., Lillig, C., &Brown, M. (1997, August). Computerized adaptive testing through the World Wide Web. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Chicago.
20. Shermis, M. D., Mzumara, H. R., Olson, J., &Harrington, S. (2001). On-line grading of student essays: PEG goes on the Web at IUPUI. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 26, 247-259.
21. Smith, W. (1993). Assessing the reliability and adequacy of using holistic scoring of essays as a college composition placement technique. In M. M. Williamson &B. Huot (Eds.), Validating holistic scoring for writing assessment: Theoretical and empirical foundations (pp. 142-205). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
22. Stiggings, R. J., &Bridgeford, N. J. (1983). An analysis of published tests of writing proficiency. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2, 6-10, 26.
23. Vantage Technologies, Inc. (1998). The efficacy of Intellimetric™ and traditional scoring for secondary-level literary analysis essays (RB-304). Yardley, PA: Author.
24. White, E. (1995). Teaching and assessing writing (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.