The Next Generation Enterprise: A CIO Perspective on the Vision, its Impacts, and Implementation Challenges

Information Systems Frontiers

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 121-138

  Kishore, Rajiv ^a   McLean, Ephraim R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^b GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Implementation of techno organizational innovations; Next generation enterprise; Organizational impacts of information technology; Pervasive and mobile information technology; Social impacts of information technology; Virtual organization

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036107452     PISSN: 13873326     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1015303109679     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Attewell P. Technology diffusion and organizational learning: The case of business computing. Organization Science 1992;3:1-19.
2. Bowen TS. IBM revs up its pervasive computing initiative. In: Infoworld, 1999:26.
3. Fichman RG. Information technology diffusion: A review of empirical research. In: Thirteenth International Conference on Information Systems, Dallas, TX, 1992:195-206.
4. Fichman RG, Kemerer CF. The assimilation of software process innovations: An organizational learning perspective. Management Science 1997;43(10):1345-1363.
5. Fields D, Miller E. Case study: A virtual group at Telcordia. In: Academia/Industry Working Conference on Research Challenges '00: Next Generation Enterprises: Virtual Organizations and Mobile/Pervasive Technologies, Buffalo, NY: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2000: Biz_b.
6. Fleischer M, Roitman D. Implementation. In: Tomatzky LG, Fleischer M, eds. The Processes of Technological Innovation, Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1990:197-232.
7. Good DJ, Schultz RJ. Strategic, Organizational and Managerial Impacts of Business Technologies. New York, NY: Quorum Books, 2000.
8. Grover V. An empirically derived model for the adoption of customer-based interorganizational systems. Decision Sciences 1993;24(3):603-640.
9. Huber GP. A theory of the effects of advanced information technologies on organization design, intelligence, and decision making. Academy of Management Review 1990;15(1):47-71.
10. Hurley RF, Huit GTM. Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: An integration and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing 1998;62:42-54.
11. Huws U, Korte WB, Robinson S. Telework: Towards the Elusive Office. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons, 1990.
12. Jarvenpaa SL, Leidner DE. Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science 1999;10(6):791-815.
13. Kishore R, McLean ER. The next generation enterprise: A virtual organization enabled by pervasive and mobile information technologies (PMITs). In: Academia/Industry Working Conference on Research Challenges '00: Next Generation Enterprises: Virtual Organizations and Mobile/Pervasive Technologies, Buffalo, NY: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2000.
14. Kraut RE, Kiesler S, Mukhopadhya T, Scherlis W, Patterson M. Social impact of the internet: What does it mean? Communications of the ACM 1998;41(12):21-22.
15. Kumar K, van Dissel HG. Sustainable collaboration: Managing conflict and cooperation in interorganizational systems. MIS Quarterly 1996;20(3):279-300.
16. Kwon TH, Zmud RW. Unifying the fragmented models of information systems implementation. In: Boland RJ Jr., Hirschheim RA, eds. Critical Issues in Information Systems Research. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 1987:227-251.
17. Lai VS, Guynes JL, Bordoloi B. ISDN: Adoption and diffusion issues. Information Systems Management 1993;10(4):46-52.
18. Laudon KC, Traver CG. The revolution is just beginning. In: E-commerce: Business, Technology, Society. New York, NY: Addison-Wesley, 2001:2-53.
19. Leaders: Onward to pervasive computing. In: Economist, 1998.
20. Leonard-Barton D. Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization. Research Policy 1988;17(5):251-267.
21. Leontief W. The Future Impact of Automation of Workers. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 1986.
22. Malone TW, Laubacher RJ. The dawn of the E-Lance economy. Harvard Business Review 1998:145-152.
23. Markus ML, Benjamin RI. Change agentry - The next IS frontier. MIS Quarterly 1996;20(4):385-407.
24. McFarlan FW. Information technology changes the way you compete. Harvard Business Review 1984;26(3):83-94.
25. McGrath RG. Exploratory learning, innovative capacity, and managerial oversight. Academy of Management Journal 2001;44(1):118-131.
26. Mowshowitz A. Virtual organization. Communications of the ACM 1997;40(9):30-37.
27. Nadler DA, Tushman ML. Designing organizations that have good fit: A framework for understanding new architectures. In: Nadler DA, Gerstein MS, Shaw RB, Associates A, eds. Organizational Architecture: Designs for Changing Organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1992:39-56.
28. Orlikowski WJ. CASE tools as organizational change: Investigating incremental and radical changes in systems development. MIS Quarterly 1993:309-340.
29. Porter ME, Fuller MB. Coalitions and global strategy. In: Porter ME, ed. Competition in Global Industries. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1986:315-344.
30. Premkumar G, Ramamurthy K, Nilakanta S. Implementation of electronic data interchange: An innovation diffusion perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems 1994;11(2):157-186.
31. Ramesh R, Rao HR, Silberman G. Foreword, AIWoRC '00: An international conference on next generation enterprises, frontiers in virtual organizations and pervasive/mobile technologies. In: Academia/Industry Working Conference on Research Challenges '00: Next Generation Enterprises: Virtual Organizations and Mobile/Pervasive Technologies, Buffalo, NY: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2000.
32. Robey D, Boudreau M-C. Accounting for the contradictory organizational consequences of information technology: Theoretical directions and methodological implications. Information Systems Research 1999;10(2):167-185.