Walking the tightrope: The Probe team's response to BRI commentaries

Building Research and Information

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 62-72

  Bordass, Bill ^a   Leaman, Adrian ^a   Cohen, Robert ^a  

^a William Bordass Associates   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY; ENERGY CONSERVATION; PRODUCTIVITY; QUALITY CONTROL; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

POST-OCCUPANCY EVALUATION (POE);

BUILDING CODES;

EID: 0036105798     PISSN: 09613218     EISSN: None     Source Type: Trade Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09613210110093059     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Post-occupancy evaluation and Probe: A New Zealand perspective
2. Assessing building performance in use 5: Conclusions and implications
3. Assessing building performance in use 1: The Probe process
4. Post-occupancy evaluation - Where are you?
5. Post-occupancy evaluation in the local government context in England - A client perspective
6. Probe in the UK context
7. How do post-occupancy evaluation and the facilities manager meet?
8. Sustainable development and post-occupancy evaluation
9. Does the building industry suffer from collective amnesia?
10. Feedback, feedforward and control: Post-occupancy evaluation to the rescue
11. Who is post-occupancy evaluation for?
12. The turning point for linking briefing and POE?
13. Closing the loop between design and use: Post-occupancy Evaluation
14. Post-occupancy evaluation, benefits and barriers