The organizational imagination: From paradigm wars to praxis

Organizational Research Methods

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 105-125

  Mir, Raza ^a   Mir, Ali ^a,b  

^a MONMOUTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b International Divisions of Labor

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036104356     PISSN: 10944281     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1094428102005001007     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Allen, R. L. (1974). Politics of the attack on Black studies. Black Scholar, 6, 11-17.
2. Alvesson, M., & Billing, Y. D. (1992). Gender and organization: Toward a differentiated understanding. Organization Studies, 13(1), 73-103.
3. Barnard, C. I. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4. Benson, K. (1977). Organizations: A dialectic view. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 1-21.
5. Bourdieu, P., Chamboredon, J. C., & Passeron, J. C. (1991). The craft of sociology: Epistemological preliminaries. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
6. Boyd, R., Gasper, P., & Trout, J. D. (1991). The philosophy of science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Brint, S. (1994). In an age of experts: The changing role of professionals in politics and public life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
8. Brown, R. E. (1978). Bureaucracy as Praxis: Toward a phenomenology of formal organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 365-382.
9. Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
10. Calas, M. B., & Smircich L. (1999). Past postmodernism? Reflections and tentative directions. The Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 649-671.
11. Clegg, S. R., & Hardy, C. (1996). Introduction: Organizations, organization and organizing. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 1-28). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Clegg, S. R., Hardy, C., & Nord, W. R. (1996). Handbook of organization studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Coser, L. A. (1965). Men of ideas: A sociologist's view. New York: Free Press.
14. Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
15. Demarest, M. (1997). Understanding knowledge management. Long Range Planning, 30(3), 374-384.
16. Donaldson, L. (1988). In successful defence of organization theory: A routing of the critics. Organization Studies, 9(1), 28-32.
17. Donaldson, L. (1996). The normal science of structural contingency theory. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 57-76). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Ehrenreich, B. (1989). Fear of falling: The inner life of the middle class. New York: Pantheon.
19. Giddens, A., & Turner, J. H. (1987). Introduction. In A. Giddens, & J. H. Turner (Eds.), Social theory today (pp. 1-10). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
20. Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
21. Hambrick, D. D., & Mason, P. O. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9, 197-206.
22. Hoggart, R. (1959). Nothing like leather. The Observer, September 6.
23. Horowitz, I. L. (1983). C. Wright Mills: An American utopia. New York: Free Press.
24. Jackall, R. (1988). Moral mazes: The world of corporate managers. New York: Oxford University Press.
25. Jacoby, R. (1987). The last intellectuals: American culture in the age of academe. New York: Basic Books.
26. Jermier, J. M., & Clegg, S. R. (1994). Crossroads: Critical issues in organization science: A dialogue. Organization Science, 5(1), 1-13.
27. Karenga, M. R. (1968). The Black community and the university: A community organizer's perspective. In A. L. Robinson, C. C. Foster, & D. H. Ogilivie (Eds.), Black studies in the university: A symposium (pp. 224-241). New Haven, CA: Yale University Press.
28. Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3, 383-397.
29. Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1996). What do firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organization Science, 7(5), 502-518.
30. Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31. Lee, A. S. (1991). Integration positivist and interpretive approaches to organizational research. Organization Science, 2(4), 342-365.
32. Liebeskind, J. P. (1996). Knowledge, strategy, and the theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 93-107.
33. Machlup, F. (1978). What is meant by methodology: A selective survey of the literature. In F. Machlup (Ed.), Methodology of economics and other social science (pp. 73-90). New York: Academic Press.
34. Marable, M. (2000). Dispatches from the ebony tower: Intellectuals confront the African American experience. New York: Columbia University Press.
35. Miller, P., & O'Leary, T. (1987). Accounting and the construction of the governable person. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(3), 235-266.
36. Mir, R. (1997). Determinants of firm performance: Toward a causal continuum between "Strategic" and "Structural" indicators. In M. A. Rahim, R. T. Golembiewski, & L. E. Pate (Eds.), Current topics in management (pp. 221-240). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
37. Mir, R., & Watson, A. (2000). Strategic management and the philosophy of science: The case for a constructivist methodology. Strategic Management Journal, 21(9), 941-953.
38. Newton, T. (1998). Theorizing subjectivity in organizations: The failure of Foucauldian Studies. Organization Studies, 19(3), 415-447.
39. Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14-38.
40. Oakes, G., & Vidich, A. J. (1999). Collaboration, reputation and ethics in American academic life: Hans H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
41. Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
42. Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.
43. Prasad, A. (1990). The concept of ideology and the transcendence of "normal science": Implications for innovations in organizational scholarship and discourse. In Proceedings of the Eastern Academy of Management (pp. 44-48). Buffalo, NY: Eastern Academy of Management.
44. Prasad, P., & Prasad, A. (2000). Stretching the iron cage: The constitution and implications of routine workplace resistance. Organization Science, 77(4), 387-403.
45. Radhakrishnan, R. (1994a). Diasporic mediations: Between home and location. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
46. Radhakrishnan, R. (1994b). Postmodernism and the rest of the world. Organization, 1(2), 305-340.
47. Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
48. Said, E. (1986). Foucault and the imagination of power. In D. C. Hoy (Ed.), Foucault: A critical reader (pp. 131-147). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
49. Said, E. (1994). Representations of the intellectual. New York: Pantheon.
50. Sennett, R. (1998). The corrosion of character: The personal consequences of work in the new capitalism. New York: Norton.
51. Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson, & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 517-551). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
52. Stem, R. N., & Barley, S. R. (1996). Organizations and social systems: Organizational theory's neglected mandate. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 146-162.
53. Wilmott, H. C. (1997). Rethinking management and managerial work: Capitalism, control, and subjectivity. Human Relations, 50(11), 1329-1359.
54. Wilmott, P. (1960). Review of the sociological imagination. Universities Quarterly, 23, 92-95.
55. Zack, M. H. (1999). Managing codified knowledge. Sloan Management Review, 40(4), 45-58.