Government as venture capital catalyst: Pitfalls and promising approaches

Economic Development Quarterly

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 49-59

  Bates, Timothy ^a  

^a WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CAPITAL PROVISION; ECONOMIC POLICY; INVESTMENT; STATE ROLE; STRATEGIC APPROACH;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0036103224     PISSN: 08912424     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0891242402016001006     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Bates, T. (1996). An analysis of the SSBIC program: Problems and prospects (Report to the U.S. Small Business Administration under research grant SBIC-94-001-1). Unpublished manuscript.
2. Bates, T. (1997). The Minority Enterprise Small Business Investment Company program: Institutionalizing a nonviable minority business assistance infrastructure. Urban Affairs Review, 32(5), 683-703.
3. Bates, T. (2000). Financing the development of minority communities: Lessons of history. Economic Development Quarterly. 14, 227-241.
4. Elango, B., Fried, V., Hisrich, R., & Polonchek, R. (1995). How venture capital funds differ. Journal of Business Venturing. 10(2), 157-170.
5. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. (1999, fall). Equity for rural America: Community development venture capital. Community Reinvestment, pp. 1-2.
6. Porter, M. (1995). The competitive advantage of inner city. Harvard Business Review, 73(5), 55-71.
7. Ruhnka, J., Feldman, H., & Dean, T. (1992). The living dead phenomenon on venture capital investments. Journal of Business Venturing, 7(2), 137-155.
8. Tesdell, K. (1999). New legislation promotes venture capital for "New Markets". Ventures, 3(1), 1.
9. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (1999). The state of the cities, 1999. Washington, DC: Author.