Gender and modes of collaboration in an engineering classroom : A profile of two women on student teams

Journal of Business and Technical Communication

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 33-68

  Ingram, Sandra ^a   Parker, Anne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036101823     PISSN: 10506519     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1050651902016001002     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Allen, Nancy, Dianne Atkinson, Meg Morgan, Teresa Moore, and Craig Snow. "What Experienced Collaborators Say about Collaborative Writing." JBTC 1.2 (1987): 70-90.
2. Blumer, Herbert. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1969.
3. Blyler, Nancy Roundy. "Pedagogy and Social Action: A Role for Narrative in Professional Communication." JBTC 9 (1995): 289-320.
4. _. "Theory and Curriculum: Reexamining the Curricular Separation of Business and Technical Communication." JBTC 7 (1993): 218-45.
5. Bogdanowicz, Maureen. "Communicative Competence: Business Savvy and the Technical Writer." Technostyle 6.1 (1987): 1-5.
6. Burnett, Rebecca E. "Conflict in Collaborative Decision-Making." Professional Communication: The Social Perspective. Ed. Nancy Roundy Blyler and Charlotte Thralls. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993. 144-62.
7. _. "Substantive Conflict in a Cooperative Context: A Way to Improve the Collaborative Planning of Workplace Documents." Technical Communication 38 (1991): 532-39.
8. Duin, Ann Hill. "Computer-Supported Collaborative Writing: The Workplace and the Writing Classroom." JBTC 5 (1991): 123-50.
9. Ede, Lisa, and Andrea Lunsford. Singular Texts/Plural Authors: Perspectives on Collaborative Writing. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1990.
10. Felder, Richard, Gary Felder, Meredith Mauney, Charles Harmin, and E. Jacquelin Dietz. "A Longitudinal Study of Engineering Student Performance and Retention: Gender Differences in Student Performance and Attitudes." Journal of Engineering Education 84 (1995): 151-63.
11. Gallaher, J., and F. Pearson. "Women's Perceptions of the Climate in Engineering Technology Programs." Journal of Engineering Education 89 (2000): 309-14.
12. Gilbertsen, Michael, and M. Jimmie Killingsworth. "Behavioral Talk-Write as a Method of Teaching Technical Editing." JBTC 1 (1987): 108-14.
13. Gilligan, Carol. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.
14. Glaser, Barney. Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press, 1978.
15. Glaser, Barney, and Anselm Strauss. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine, 1967.
16. Herrick, Jeanne Weiland. "'And Then She Said': Office Stories and What They Tell Us about Gender in the Workplace." JBTC 13 (1999): 274-96.
17. Herring, Susan C. "Gender and Democracy in Computer-Mediated Communication." Electronic Journal of Communication 3.2 (1993). 4 Oct. 2000. http://dc.smu.edu/dc/classroom/gender.txt.
18. Ingram, Sandra. "Gender and Modes of Collaboration in Engineering: Technical Communication as a Social Process." Technostyle 14 (1998): 21-40.
19. Ingram, Sandra, and Anne Parker. "Gender and Modes of Collaboration in the Engineering Classroom." Unpublished report. University of Manitoba, 2000.
20. Kahn, Robert L., and Charles F. Cannell. The Dynamics of Interviewing: Theory, Technique, and Cases. New York: John Wiley, 1957.
21. Lajeunesse, Claude. "Women in Engineering: A Progress Report on the Situation in Universities." Women in Engineering Conference. Fredericton, Can., 11 May 1995.
22. Lay, Mary. "The Androgynous Collaborator: The Impact of Gender Studies on Collaboration." New Visions of Collaborative Writing. Ed. Janis Forman. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook-Heinemann, 1992. 82-104.
23. _ "Gender Studies: Implications for the Professional Communication Classroom." Professional Communication: The Social Perspective. Ed. Nancy Roundy Blyler and Charlotte Thralls. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993. 215-29.
24. _. "Interpersonal Conflict in Collaborative Writing: What We Can Learn from Gender Studies." JBTC 3.2 (1989): 5-28.
25. Lewis, Philip, Dayne Aldridge, and Paul Swamidass. "Assessing Teaming Skills Acquisition on Undergraduate Project Teams." Journal of Engineering Education 87 (1998): 149-55.
26. Lind, Mary R. "The Gender Impact of Temporary Virtual Work Groups." IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 42 (1999): 276-85.
27. Lyons, Nona Plessner. "Two Perspectives: On Self, Relationships, and Morality." Harvard Educational Review 53 (1982): 125-45.
28. Mcllwee, Judith S., and J. Gregg Robinson. Women in Engineering: Gender, Power and Workplace Culture. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992.
29. Mehan, Hugh. "Language and Power in Organizational Process." Discourse Processes 10 (1987): 291-301.
30. Minister, Kristina. "A Feminist Frame for the Oral History Interview." Women's Words: The Feminist Practice of Oral History. Eds. S. B. Gluck and A. Patai. New York: Routledge, 1991. 27-41.
31. Padgett, Deborah. Qualitative Methods in Social Work and Research: Challenges and Rewards. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1998.
32. Parker, Anne. "Evaluating Collaborative Projects and Evaluation Tools: Putting the Pieces of the Collaborative Puzzle Together." Technostyle 12.1 (1995): 99-115.
33. _. "Implementing Collaborative Projects into the Technical Writing Classroom." Technostyle 10.2 (1992): 30-48.
34. _. "Problem-Solving Applied to Teaching Technical Writing." The Technical Writing Teacher 17.2 (1990): 95-103.
35. Roever, Carol, and Diane Mullen. "Teamwork: Preparing Students for the New Reality." JBTC 8 (1994): 462-74.
36. Tannen, Deborah. Talking from Nine to Five: How Women's and Men's Conversational Styles Affect Who Gets Heard, Who Gets Credit, and What Gets Done at Work. New York: Morrow, 1994.
37. _. You Just Don't Understand: Men and Women in Conversation. New York: Morrow, 1990.
38. Tonso, Karen L. "Student Learning and Gender." Journal of Engineering Education 85 (1996): 143-50.