Implicit cognition and the social unconscious

Theory & Psychology

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 37-54

  Steele, Robert S ^a   Morawski, Jill G ^a  

^a WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

cognition; dynamic social processes; gender biases; implicit social; social unconscious

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036101822     PISSN: 09593543     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0959354302121003     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Baumeister, R.(1987). How the self became a problem: A psychological review of historical research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 163-176.
2. Bayer, B.M., & Shotter, J. (Eds.). (1998). Reconstructing the psychological subject: Bodies, practices, and technologies. New York/London: Sage.
3. Bleier, R.(1984). Science and gender: A critique of biology and its theories on women. New York: Pergamon.
4. Butler, J.(1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
5. Cushman, P.(1990). Why the self is empty: Toward a historically situated psychology. American Psychologist, 45, 599-611.
6. Danziger, K.(1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. New York: Cambridge University Press.
7. Ferguson, K.E.(1993). The man question: Visions of subjectivity in feminist theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.
8. Flax, J.(1990). Thinking fragments: Psychoanalysis, feminism, and postmodernism in the contemporary West. Berkeley: University of California Press.
9. Gardiner, J.K.(1995). Provoking agents: Gender and agency in theory and practice. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
10. Golinsky, J.(1998). Making natural knowledge: Constructivism and the history of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Graumann, C.F., & Gergen, K.J. (Eds.). (1996). Historical dimensions of psychological discourse. New York: Cambridge University Press.
12. Greenwald, A.G., & Banaji, M.R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102(1), 4-27.
13. Haraway, D.(1989). Primate visions: Gender, race, and nature in the world of Modern science. New York: Routledge.
14. Harding, S.(1986). The science question in feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
15. Henriques, J., Hollway, C., Urwin, C., Venn, C., & Walkerdine, V. (Eds.) (1984). Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity. London: Methuen.
16. Hornstein, G.A.(1988). Quantifying psychological phenomena: Debates, dilemmas and implications. In J.G. Morawski (Ed.), The rise of experimentation in American psychology (pp. 1-34). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
17. Jakobsen, J.R.(1998). Working alliances and the politics of difference. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
18. Jhally, S.(1990). The code of advertising: Fetishism and the political economy of meaning in the consumer society. New York/London: Routledge.
19. Jhally, S.(1995). Dream worlds II: Desire, sex and power in music video. Northampton: Media Education Foundation.
20. Keller, E.F.(1985). Reflections on gender and science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
21. Kelley, C.M., & Linsday, D.S. (1996). Conscious and unconscious forms of memory. In E.L. Bjork & R.A. Bjork (Eds.), Memory (pp. 31-63). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
22. Kilbourne, J.(1995). Slim hopes: Advertising and the obsession with thinness. Northampton: Media Education Foundation.
23. Kilbourne, J.(1999). Deadly persuasion: Why women and girls must fight the addictive power of advertising. New York: Free Press.
24. Lamb, S.(1991). Acts without agents: An analysis of linguistic avoidance in journal articles on men who batter women. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 61(2), 250-257.
25. Latour, B.(1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26. Lichtman, R.(1982). The production of desire: The integration of psychoanalysis into Marxist theory. New York: Free Press.
27. Mann, P.S.(1994). Micro-politics: Agency in the post feminist era. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
28. Merchant, C.(1980). Death of nature: Women, ecology and the scientific revolution. New York: Harper & Row.
29. Merleau-Ponty, M.(1962). Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
30. Merleau-Ponty, M.(1968). The visible and the invisible (A. Lingis, Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
31. Morawski, J.G.(1988). Impossible experiments and practical constructions: The social bases of psychologists' work. In J.G. Morawski (Ed.), The rise of experimentation in American psychology (pp. 72-93). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
32. Morawski, J.G.(1994). Practicing feminisms, reconstructing psychology: Notes on a liminal science. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
33. O'Donnell, J.M.(1979). The ‘crisis of experimentalism’ in the twenties: E.G. Boring and his uses of historiography. American Psychologist, 34, 289-295.
34. Reber, A.S.(1993). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge: An essay on the cognitive unconscious. New York: Oxford University Press.
35. Rose, N.(1989). Individualizing psychology. In J. Shotter & K.J. Gergen (Eds.), Texts of identity (pp. 119-131). London: Sage.
36. Rose, N.(1992). Engineering the human soul: Analyzing psychological expertise. Science in Context, 5, 351-369.
37. Rosenzweig, S.(1933). The experimental situation as a psychological problem. Psychological Review, 40, 337-354.
38. Rosnow, R.L.(1981). Paradigms in transition: The methodology of social inquiry. New York: Oxford University Press.
39. Samelson, F.(1974). History, origin myth, and ideology: Comte's discovery of social psychology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 4, 217-231.
40. Samelson, F.(1980). J.B. Watson's Little Albert, Cyril Burt's twins, and the need for a critical science. American Psychologist, 35, 619-625.
41. Sampson, E.E.(1977). Psychology and the American ideal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1332-1343.
42. Seltzer, M.(1992). Bodies and machines. New York: Routledge.
43. Silverman, I.(1970). The psychological subject in the land of make-believe. Contemporary Psychology, 15, 718-721.
44. Smith, R.(1992). Inhibition: History and meaning in the sciences of mind and brain. Berkeley: University of Califomnia Press.
45. Stam, H.J.(1993). ‘Is there anything beyond the ideological critique of individualism?. In H.J. Stam, L.J. Mos, W. Thorngate, & B. Kaplan (Eds.), Recent trends in theoretical psychology, Vol. III (pp. 143-152). New York: Springer-Verlag.
46. Suls, J.M., & Rosnow, R.L. (1988). Concerns about artifacts in psychological experiments. In J.G. Morawski (Ed.), The rise of experimentation in American psychology (pp. 163-187). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
47. Taylor, C.(1989). Sources of the self: The making of modern identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
48. Winter, D.G.(1996). Personality: Analysis and interpretation of lives. New York: McGraw-Hill.
49. Woolgar, S.(1988). Science: The very idea. New York: Tavistock.
50. Young, R.M.(1966). Scholarship and the history of the behavioral sciences. History of Science, 5, 1-51.