Review of big-game survey methods used by wildlife agencies of the western United States

Wildlife Society Bulletin

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 46-52

  Rabe, Michael J ^a   Rosenstock, Steven S ^a   DeVos Jr , James C ^a  

^a ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT   (United States)

Author keywords

Antilocapra americana; Bighorn sheep; Cervus elaphus; Game management; Mule deer; Odocoileus hemionus; Odocoileus virginianus; Ovis canadensis; Population size; Pronghorn; Sampling design; State wildlife agencies; Survey cost; Survival; White tailed deer

Indexed keywords

HUNTING; METHODOLOGY; POPULATION ESTIMATION; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY; UNGULATE; WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT;

UNITED STATES;

ANTILOCAPRA AMERICANA; CERVUS ELAPHUS; ODOCOILEUS HEMIONUS; ODOCOILEUS VIRGINIANUS; OVIS CANADENSIS;

EID: 0036100031     PISSN: 00917648     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Accuracy of helicopter counts of mule deer in pinyon-juniper woodland
2. Sampling plans for mule deer sex and age ratios
3. Interpretation of age ratios
4. Use of aerial line transect surveys to estimate pronghorn density
5. A helicopter quadrat census for mule deer on Uncompahgre Plateau, Colorado
6. Concepts of large herbivore dynamics
7. Variation in black-tailed deer herd composition counts
8. Coping with uncertainty in wildlife biology
9. Aerial counting experiments to estimate pronghorn density and herd structure
10. A comparative evaluation of techniques for analyzing white-tailed deer harvest data
11. Distribution of mule deer and elk in relation to roads
12. Visibility bias during aerial surveys of elk in north-central Idaho
13. Sightability adjustment methods for aerial surveys of wildlife populations
14. Elk sightability model validation at the National Bison Range, Montana
15. Mule deer survival in Colorado, Idaho, and Montana
16. Mule deer management - What should be monitored?