Bullet trajectory predicts the need for damage control; an artificial neural network model

Journal of Trauma

Volumn 52, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 852-858

  Hirshberg, Asher ^a   Wall, Matthew J ^a   Mattox, Kenneth L ^a  

^a BEN TAUB GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Abdominal trauma; Artificial neural network; Damage control; Decision support

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL INJURY; ADULT; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONFERENCE PAPER; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; GUNSHOT INJURY; HUMAN; INJURY SCALE; LAPAROTOMY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ABDOMINAL INJURIES; ADULT; BLOOD PRESSURE; HUMANS; LAPAROTOMY; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROC CURVE; WOUNDS, GUNSHOT;

EID: 0036098597     PISSN: 00225282     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00005373-200205000-00006     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Rotondo MF, Zonies DH. The damage control sequence and underlying logic. Surg Clin North Am. 1997; 77; 761-777.
2. Garrison JR, Richardson JD, Hilakos AS, et al. Predicting the need to pack early for intra-abdominal hemorrhage. J Trauma. 1996; 40; 923-929.
3. Hirshberg A, Mattox KL. Hypothermia-coagulopathy-acidosis syndrome; when to operate/when to stop pperating. In; Baue A, Faist E, Fry D, eds. Multiple Organ Failure. New York; Springer-Verlag; 2000; 265-270.
4. Feliciano DV, Moore EE, Mattox KL. Trauma damage control. In; Mattox KL, Feliciano DV, Moore EE, eds. Trauma. 4th ed. New York; McGraw-Hill; 2000; 907-931.
5. Drew PJ, Monson JRT. Artificial neural networks. Surgery. 2000; 127; 3-11.
6. Kattan MW, Beck R. Artificial neural networks for medical classifications decisions. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1995; 119; 672-677.
7. Trunkey DD. Torso trauma. Curr Probl Surg. 187; 24; 209-265.
8. Dayhoff JE, De Leo JM. Artificial neural networks; opening the black box. Cancer. 2001; 91; 1615-1635.
9. Cross SS, Harrison RF, Kennedy RL. Introduction to neural networks. Lancet. 1995; 34; 1075-1079.
10. Grossman MD, May AK, Schwab CW, et al. Determining anatomic injury with computed tomography in selected torso gunshot wounds. J Trauma. 1998; 45; 446-453.
11. Demetriades D, Velmahos G, Cornwell E III, et al. Selective nonoperative management of gunshot wounds of the anterior abdomen. Arch Surg. 1997; 132; 178-183.
12. Demetriades D, Gomez H, Chahwan S, et al. Gunshot injuries to the liver; the role of selective nonoperative management. J Am Coll Surg. 1999; 188; 343-348.
13. Renz BM, Feliciano DV. Gunshot wounds to the right thoracoabdomen; a prospective study of nonoperative management. J Trauma. 1994; 37; 737-744.
14. Hirshberg A, Or J, Stein M, Walden R. Transaxial gunshot injuries. J Trauma. 1996; 41; 460-461.
15. Ogunyemi O, Clarke JR, Webber B, Badler N. TraumaSCAN; assessing penetrating trauma with geometric and probabilistic reasoning. Proc AMIA Symp 2000; 620-624.
16. Mc Gonigal MD, Cole J, Schwab W, Kauder DR, Rotondo MF, Angood PB. A new approach to probability of survival scoring for trauma quality assurance. J Trauma. 1993; 34; 863-870.
17. Rutledge R. Injury severity and probability of survival assessment in trauma patients using a predictive hierarchical network model derived from ICD-9 codes. J Trauma. 1995; 38; 590-601.
18. Rutledge R, Osler T, Emery S, Kromhout-Schiro S. The end of the Injury Severity Score (ISS) and the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS); ICISS, an International Classification of Disease, ninth revision-based prediction tool, outperforms both ISS and TRISS as predictions of trauma patient survival, hospital charges, and hospital length of stay. J Trauma. 1998; 44; 41-49.
19. DiRusso SM, Sullivan T, Holly C, Cuff SN, Savino J. An artificial neural network as a model for prediction of survival in trauma patients; validation for a regional trauma area. J Trauma. 2000; 49; 212-223.
20. Marble RP, Healy JC. A neural network approach to the diagnosis of morbidity outcomes in trauma care. Artif Intell Med. 1999; 15; 299-307.
21. Hunter A, Kennedy L, Henry J, Ferguson I. Application of neural networks and sensitivity analysis to improved prediction of trauma survival. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2000; 62; 11-19.
22. Becalick DC, Coats TJ. Comparison of artificial intelligence techniques with UKTRISS for estimating probability of survival after trauma; UK Trauma and Injury Severity Score. J Trauma. 2001; 51; 123-133.
23. Dombi GW, Nandi P, Saxe JM, Ledgerwood A, Lucas CE. Prediction of rib fracture injury outcome by an artificial neural network. J Trauma. 1995; 39; 915-921.
24. Sinha M, Kennedy CS, Ramundo ML. Artificial neural network predicts CT scan abnormalities in pediatric patients with closed head injury. J Trauma. 2001; 50; 308-312.
25. Lange EW, Pitts LH, Damron SL, Rutledge R. Outcome after severe head injury; an analysis of prediction based upon comparison of neural network versus logistic regression analysis. Neurol Res. 1997; 19; 274-280.
26. Li YC, Liu L, Chiu WT, Jian WS. Neural network modeling for surgical decisions on traumatic brain injury patients. Int J Med Inf. 2000; 57; 1-9.
27. Wyatt J. Nervous about artificial neural networks? Lancet. 1995; 34; 1175-1177.
28. Rotondo MF, Schwab CW, Mc Gonigal MD, et al. Damage control; an approach for improved survival in exsanguinating penetrating abdominal injury. J Trauma. 1993; 35; 375-383.
29. Velmahos JC, Demetriades D, Foianini E, et al. A selective approach to the management of gunshot wounds to the back. Am J Surg. 1997; 174; 342-346.
30. Mc Kinley BA, Moore FA, Sailors RM, et al. Computerized decision support for mechanical ventilation of trauma induced ARDS; results of a randomized clinical trial. J Trauma. 2001; 50; 415-424.