Trapping efficiency of Ugglan traps and Longworth traps for house mice in south-eastern Australia

Wildlife Research

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 101-103

  Jacob, Jens ^a   Ylonen H ^a   Hodkinson, C G ^a  

^a CSIRO   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PEST CONTROL; RODENT; TRAPPING;

AUSTRALIA;

ANIMALIA; MAMMALIA; MUS; MUS MUSCULUS; MUS MUSCULUS DOMESTICUS; RODENTIA; VICTORIA;

EID: 0036094508     PISSN: 10353712     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1071/WR01048     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. On the relation between the numbers of traps in a point of catch and trappability of small rodents
2. Pitfall trapping of Microtus townsendii
3. Prebaiting small mammals and a new design of live trap
4. A potential bias in the use of Longworth traps
5. Observations on the trap response of wild house mice, Mus domesticus Rutty, in poultry houses
6. The effect of camouflage on the vandalism and efficiency of Longworth small mammal traps
7. The importance of land management for population parameters and spatial behavior in common voles (Microtus arvalis)
8. Trappability estimates for markrecapture data
9. The relative efficiency of two commercial live-traps for small mammals
10. Techniques for trapping the rice-field rat, Rattus argentiventer
11. Use of a mesh live trap for small mammals: Are results from Sherman live traps deceptive?
12. A comparison of the effectiveness of pitfall and Longworth live-trapping techniques in population studies of house mice
13. Does trap odour influence estimation of population size of the short tailed vole, Microtus agrestis?
14. Problems of live-trapping and population estimation for the wood mouse, Apodemus sylvaticus (L.)
15. Relative efficiencies of four small mammal traps